Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/J6OFOSBKYWCXMWAPK5B2LFQ4GTRZYXA7/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "J6OFOSBKYWCXMWAPK5B2LFQ4GTRZYXA7",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/QTJJ3METCMSEEET5WELOFRUPK5OBSELC/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "bbj (a) innismir.net",
        "mailman_id": "0a00322121654998b9a943e3aa653538",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/0a00322121654998b9a943e3aa653538/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "Ben Jackson",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Icom D-Star",
    "date": "2011-04-25T11:10:23Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/ICXOFTXVJQHNLIUB6THV62CD5UDVYZVK/",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/PUEOGYAWAMFHRXRZRDDBVQN2X7WT6WUM/"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "On 4/23/2011 2:42 PM, Gordon JC Pearce wrote:\n> On Sat, 2011-04-23 at 10:42 -0500, Gregg Wonderly wrote:\n>> In the end, digital compression of spectrum space is going to happen more and\n>> more.  AM style broadcast is hugely inefficient even though it is painfully\n>\n> Okay, but *why*?  Why are we so obsessed with squeezing bandwidth down\n> and down, at the expense of intelligibility?\n\nYou unfortunately provided data on why we should get ahead of crunching \ndown bandwidth: Because sooner or later, we're going to get squeezed for \nbandwidth due to our spectrum being fairly empty and everyone and their \nbrother wanting to push IP to their new wireless toaster service.\n\nI'm not a fan of proprietary codecs but our lack of an alternative back \nin the 2000s caused D-STAR to be used with AMBE. Too bad, so sad. Don't \nsupport it, probably not going to use it. My worry is that even though \nwe provided a alternative with Codec2, what cutting edge technology that \nwill be here five years from now are we not developing because we were \nplaying catch up?\n\n-- \nBen Jackson - N1WBV - New Bedford, MA\nbbj <at> innismir.net - http://www.innismir.net/\n",
    "attachments": []
}