Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/JA5APUS2SMFZB7L3RRNP2KIYUFFVCI2P/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "JA5APUS2SMFZB7L3RRNP2KIYUFFVCI2P",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/MLN6EA2IR42R5XAMD64IKICHLQVJQTM7/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "hartzell (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "11e371d6dacd43b7a2b3a3c751e6641e",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/11e371d6dacd43b7a2b3a3c751e6641e/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Dave hartzell",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Lunar Architecture Moon Base",
    "date": "2006-12-06T17:16:54Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/MLN6EA2IR42R5XAMD64IKICHLQVJQTM7/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "James,\n\nGreat info!  What would the pros/cons be of using a v/u or u/v transponder?\n\nClearly the noise levels are higher, but folks are already making EME\ncontacts with both of these bands.  Digital bit rates would be lower,\nbut still possible.  Wouldn't antenna beam widths be wider as well?\n\n73,\n\nDave\nNøTGD\n\nOn 12/5/06, James R Miller <[email protected]> wrote:\n> On Dec 04, Pat, KA9SCF wrote:\n>\n> > With the amount of libration on the moon, what's the maximum antenna gain\n> > per band that you can get before it becomes too much of an issue.\n>\n> http://www.amsat.org/amsat/articles/g3ruh/110.html\n>\n> Perhaps this should be in the Amsat FAQ   =%-)\n>\n> 73 de James G3RUH\n\n\n-- \n\"Truth and technology will triumph over bullsh*t and bureaucracy!\" -\nRene Anselmo.\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}