Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/JCU6IH5T3HCHFRE2QBM7TTWU7QVUO34U/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "012620090328.28889.497D2DD10003CD38000070D922155786740B9D04C999@comcast.net",
    "message_id_hash": "JCU6IH5T3HCHFRE2QBM7TTWU7QVUO34U",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/JCU6IH5T3HCHFRE2QBM7TTWU7QVUO34U/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "w7lrd (a) comcast.net",
        "mailman_id": "717aa2a241704c7497e9abd8c983f6b7",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/717aa2a241704c7497e9abd8c983f6b7/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "[email protected]",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Here we go again Was message board post",
    "date": "2009-01-26T03:28:17Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "My three cents.  AO-7 is as good as it gets as far a time on satellite and distance.  It is very under used.  I have been in many three way QSO's where we do what we do.  We have a fun bunch of \"characters\" that I enjoy yaking with.  I believe in the concept and the idea that eventually we will have a HEO.  It depends on efforts and support now, not after launch.  I can be found on AO-7 on most passes.\n73 Bob W7LRD\nAMSAT 28498\n\n--\n\"if this were easy, everyone would be doing it\"\n\n-------------- Original message -------------- \nFrom: \"Jack K.\" <[email protected]> \n\n> \n> I hesitate to toss my two cents in as I am not a member of AMSAT and have \n> not been one for a long time as AMSAT apparently has moved in directions my \n> interests do not lie. I still read the bb messages and I still want to get \n> back on the sats, but 15 second more or less contacts do no interest me \n> regardless of what the mode is. I have no interest in chasing sates to \n> listen to their telemetry - My feeling is that if I can not use the stinking \n> thing, then I am not going to support it. \n> \n> So until there are some SSB high level sats going up or there is something \n> beyond the \"lets talk about it\" stage my efforts and my wallet won't support \n> AMSAT or anyone else. Yeah I know I am by using the BB and yes that makes me \n> a moocher, but on the other hand maybe someone will read it and take a hint \n> and once more I will have something usefull to me and my efforts and bucks \n> will once more flow outward instead of just dusting my old Sat equipment \n> which I should have sold long ago, but kept believing that one day AMSAT \n> would have a high level Sat again that actually worked when it went up \n> \n> DE KD1PE \n> \n> _______________________________________________ \n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. \n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! \n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb \n",
    "attachments": []
}