Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/JHE2WXCSQIWO5Q23V5T4TMT2IUGO2ECR/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "JHE2WXCSQIWO5Q23V5T4TMT2IUGO2ECR",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/JHE2WXCSQIWO5Q23V5T4TMT2IUGO2ECR/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "updwrb (a) bristor-assoc.com",
        "mailman_id": "6a38e6f613ad494f85758faeecec9d50",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/6a38e6f613ad494f85758faeecec9d50/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "w4upd",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: SatPC32",
    "date": "2010-01-27T20:01:23Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "You know Tim. You are one of those people that get under some of our \nskins. If you read \"all\" of my email, you note I stated that the FT-817 \nworked fine under HRD. So I do take offense at your comments. Both \nradios work fine under HRD. I'm started to play with SatPC32 and since \nits radio setups are not quite as intuit as others, I have found that \nthe SQF files are why I am having some of the problems. The German error \nmessage is obviously a problem with SatPC32ISS and looks to be some sort \nof memory problem but can't read German. I have to use Task Manager to \nclose it.\n\nI feel your pain as I have been unemployed for 27 months. A simple \ncomment of \"it sounds like an SQF file problem\" would have suffice.\n\nRegards,\n\nReid, W4UPD\n\n\n\nTim - N3TL wrote:\n> Hey Reid,\n>\n> I mean no offense, but either there's some kind of operator error going on\n> in your shack, or the CAT plug in your FT-817 may be dead. I'm using SatPC\n> 32 - unregistered - with two ft-817s. I had also used it with at FT-857D,\n> but the CAT plug on it dies right after Field Day.\n>\n> Do you have Ham Radio Deluxe installed - or any other program that uses the\n> CAT plug to send data to the FT-817? If so, is your connection there still\n> working? If not, it's the radio. I'm told there is a tiny fuse of some sort\n> inside the Yaesu radios just behind the CAT plug that can blow. That appears\n> to be what happened to my 857. I haven't had it repaired yet because I've\n> been unemployed for 13 months.\n>\n> Other things to check:\n>\n> Do you have the CAT parameters set the same for both radios? To programs\n> like SatPC and HRD, they are identical. I know because I've interchanged\n> radio IDs with no problem.\n>\n> One other thing you can try - IF you have the newest version of SatPC. If\n> you know your CAT plug on the 817 is good, and if you know that the CAT\n> settings are the same for both radios, go into SatPC and create a new\n> profile, which this latest version allows you to do. You can have up to 4.\n>\n> Erich, the author of SatPC 32, suggested I try that to eliminate some\n> switching issues I was having here, and it worked perfectly.\n>\n> I hope something in here proves helpful.\n>\n> Tim - N3TL\n>\n> -----Original Message-----\n> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On\n> Behalf Of w4upd\n> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 12:15 PM\n> To: amsat-bb\n> Subject: [amsat-bb] SatPC32\n>\n> Having a few issues using SatPC32 and especially Yaesu gear, \n> specifically FT-817 and FT-857. The copy I aa using is not a registered \n> version yet nor have I modified any of the SQF files.\n>\n> When using on the FT-817, I cannot get any response to the radio. It \n> doesn't appear to follow the doppler corrections being issued by the \n> program. When using the FT-857, the unit appears to semi-work, but it \n> seems to switch between 2 vfos. When using my Icom IC-910, it works fine \n> if I let it go into satellite mode.\n>\n> If this is just a file editing problem let me know. In general, I'll be \n> using the IC-910 most often but have considered using the 817/857 for \n> portable operation if I can get it to work correctly. I also noticed \n> that the FT-857 has issues with HRD as well, but that's a subject for \n> another time.\n>\n> Any guesses as to why FT-817 not working or does there need to be some \n> initial file modifications?\n>\n> Regards,\n>\n>     Reid, W4UPD\n>\n>   \n\n",
    "attachments": []
}