Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/JRVQKILSCUA6HBZNP5L6XX3ESR45HB36/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "JRVQKILSCUA6HBZNP5L6XX3ESR45HB36",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/JRVQKILSCUA6HBZNP5L6XX3ESR45HB36/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "rob_g8ate (a) hotmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "1248fb5843d845b19f2f3eb02c1d1f12",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/1248fb5843d845b19f2f3eb02c1d1f12/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "Robert Turlington",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Courteous AO-51 Operation",
    "date": "2008-03-19T15:15:55Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "\nHi John\nmy reply was in no way a critique of the article I just thought it should not specifically refer to one particular single channel bird but to all. Of course reference could be made to AO51 as a particularly bad example but so far as I am concerned they are as bad as each other in one way or another. By the way I am a regular on all of the birds single channel or linear ,for example 26 countries/4 continents worked on A16 and about 100 callsigns.Regards Robert G8ATE > Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:51:48 -0400> From: [email protected]> To: [email protected]> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Courteous AO-51 Operation> > Good Afternoon, all...> > Robert, I think the main point that Ben is trying to make with these> \"friendly suggestions\" is civility. Love the single-channel FM satellites> or not, they are a fact of life throughout AMSAT. And AO-51 is arguably the> worst as far as manners and good operating procedures are concerned. This> doesn't mean that it doesn't happen on other single-channel birds.> > Consider this: You are trying to give a demo to a group that's interested> in satellite-based Amateur Radio. You do your best to convey ease of use,> technical skill and accomplishment, and the fact that satellite hams in> general are a great bunch of guys...etc etc etc. Then, you tune into AO-51> for the demo...and you hear \"the Zoo\".> > Some of it is just common sense...like using headphones...not using too much> power (we ALL know at least one person that does), but Ben worded some of> the suggestions to try to \"level the field\", and help to make it more fair> for everyone.> > As our fleet gets older, and more satellites become non-operational...and> more Amateurs enter the ranks, the FM satellites will undoubtedly get worse,> more crowded, etc. As this becomes reality, there are 3 routes to take to> solve the \"problem\": A) Move to the Linear Satellites...B) Build more FM> Satellites (which some will absolutely HATE)...or C) Learn to become a more> efficient operator and get along with each other.> > Sadly, though...I have a feeling that this will reignite the Linear Vs. FM> debate.> > > John KB2HSH> > > > > -- > _______________________________> > > John Marranca, Jr> PBX Technician/Shop Steward CWA Local 1122> BN Systems, Inc> Orchard Park, NY> (716)972-2006> _______________________________________________> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n_________________________________________________________________\nWho's friends with who and co-starred in what?\nhttp://www.searchgamesbox.com/celebrityseparation.shtml",
    "attachments": []
}