Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/JUW7ZE5OWNKGYUAQVYCB5U3FUAB33NWI/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "JUW7ZE5OWNKGYUAQVYCB5U3FUAB33NWI",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/RDYLNWN7U2WHHRP6LRDJZ4VVTHD22WYX/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "andrewkoenig (a) thathamkid.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Andrew Koenig",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Best HT's for sats?",
    "date": "2008-04-04T03:16:19Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/KSPEDYLRWDLTJWQ7BP72SOKXQB7GHILC/",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "I do the same thing with my 2 FT-60's in full duplex (I just got it working\ntonight). I have a pair of headphones and my iPod with the iTalk module to\nrecord all of the contacts I make. I find it a lot easier to do that then\ntrying to scribble calls as I go.\n\nBill, if you're looking for a full duplex radio, I don't really have many\nsuggestions, but you mentioned having a VX-2. The VX-2 has a VERY nice\nreceiver, so with the VX-2 for RX and a FT-60 for TX I think it'd work out\npretty nice for you.\n\nOn Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Mark Vandewettering <\[email protected]> wrote:\n\n>\n> On Apr 3, 2008, at 5:11 PM, Bill Dzurilla wrote:\n> > I've made many sat contacts with my VX-2R but am\n> > thinking about upgrading to something with 5 watts\n> > output.  I used a borrowed IC-W32A and Swan Island and\n> > it worked fine, although I could not hear my downlink\n> > in full duplex mode, too much desensing.  Not sure\n> > full duplex is even worth the extra money, as it seems\n> > that most duplex HTs have a similar desensing problem.\n> >\n> > I was thinking about trading in the VX-2R for an FT-60\n> > or a VX-6R, any comments on these or other\n> > sat-friendly HTs?\n> >\n> > 73, Bill NZ5N\n>\n> I've been using a TH-D7A and an Arrow antenna.  Works\n> great, no problem with desense, and it's fun to use\n> the APRS stuff to bounce packets off ISS, Go-32 and NO-44.\n> It's not the most glamorous, but it works very well for\n> satellites, and I have no hesitation in recommending it\n> for that.\n>\n> I find the full-duplex to be really useful.  I put a\n> splitter on the sound output, and run half to some\n> cheap earbuds and the other to a voice recorder.  That\n> way, I can record both my voice and others without\n> difficulty.  Scan back through my blog @ http://brainwagon.org\n> for example mp3s.\n>\n>        Mark KF6KYI\n>\n> >\n> >\n> >\n> >\n> >\n> ____________________________________________________________________________________\n> > You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of\n> > Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost.\n> > http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com\n> > _______________________________________________\n> > Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the\n> > author.\n> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite\n> > program!\n> > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n\n\n\n-- \n73's\nAndrew K.\nKE5GDB\nhttp://www.thathamkid.com\n",
    "attachments": []
}