Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/K43H7ATKOGYG5LWCULWJNJUYPZDEAHWQ/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/K43H7ATKOGYG5LWCULWJNJUYPZDEAHWQ/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "K43H7ATKOGYG5LWCULWJNJUYPZDEAHWQ",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/D2SHA7WJAIRVODYBTP5GLMVGFY32GAMK/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "stanw1le (a) verizon.net",
        "mailman_id": "cde59a7de6874af3b354fb231df89b4c",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/cde59a7de6874af3b354fb231df89b4c/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Stan W1LE",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Gain VS Bandwidth at 2.4GHZ",
    "date": "2009-05-16T15:16:36Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/D2SHA7WJAIRVODYBTP5GLMVGFY32GAMK/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/3MCIRVRBUGRHOYRQG6PK5BIIXBIZR2IG/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Hello Luc,\n\nLike any other fleamarket/hamfest/ebay item, you do not know what you have\ntill you get it home and and evaluated on the test bench. Bid \naccordingly.....\n\nThe feed is probably a simple dipole. Take the plastic housing apart and\ntune the dipole (shorten/lengthen) to where you want it.\n\nOr, get another feed for the freqs needed.\nThe manufacturer may offer different freq response feeds for their same \ndish.\n\nMy first gridded dish I tuned up for 2304 MHz and it performed well \nafterwards.\nThe gridded dish on the satellite tower came with a decent VSWR at 2400 MHz.\n\nThe fades in reception of 2.4 GHz satellites are due to using a linear \npolarization\nand NOT a circular polarization. Try a circularly polarized feed.\nOr try a H AND a V linearly polarized antenna system,\nselect in the shack which one to listen to.\n\nStan,W1LE   Cape Cod    FN41sr\n\n\n\nLuc Leblanc wrote:\n> For those who are using WiFi 802,G beam on S band \n>\n> I just found that my Pacific Wireless WIMAX VA 25 -16 antenna for 2.4GHZ has a bandwidth starting at 2.5ghz to 2.7ghz (www.pacwireless.com) \n> Even if at theses frequencies things are a bit larger i'm guessing the 16db gain figures are surely not standing at 2.4ghz. Did any one \n> have a ball game figures of what remains at 2.4ghz? I have no way to measure SWR at this frequency and this is surely not optimal?\n>\n> Conclusion don't jump too fast on some hamfest deal as what's good for WiFI is not always so good at 2.4ghz!\n>\n> P.S. I can use the antenna on 2.4ghz and i got fairly good signal from AO-51 when he's in S mode but i cannot get rid out of the fades. \n> Could be i found why?\n>\n>\n> \"-\"\n>\n>\n> Luc Leblanc VE2DWE\n> Skype VE2DWE\n> www.qsl.net/ve2dwe\n> WAC BASIC CW PHONE SATELLITE\n>\n>  \n>\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n>   \n\n",
    "attachments": []
}