Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/K43MPK3RCKPVDAHMUZIW4ZDDA4LJELJL/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "K43MPK3RCKPVDAHMUZIW4ZDDA4LJELJL",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/K43MPK3RCKPVDAHMUZIW4ZDDA4LJELJL/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "kk5do (a) arrl.net",
        "mailman_id": "0afa6cdae1634381a4836e7e59977b8c",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/0afa6cdae1634381a4836e7e59977b8c/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Bruce",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Second transponder on AO-51 at field day",
    "date": "2007-05-04T03:47:24Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "I don't know where you got the idea you could not make a contact on each \ntransponder of AO-51. If you look at the rules below, which appear in \nthe Official AMSAT Field Day Rules, it specifically states \"EACH \nSATELLITE TRANSPONDER is considered to be a separate band.\" That means \nif both transponders are turned on for AO-51, then you can have \"ONE\" \ncontact on each \"single-channel FM satellite\". There are two-channels, \nthus one contact on each for a total of two.\n\n73...bruce\nAMSAT Director of Contests and Awards\n\nfrom official rules\n\nsnip...\n\n- Each phone, CW, and digital segment ON EACH SATELLITE TRANSPONDER is \nconsidered to be a separate band.\n\n- CW and digital (RTTY, PSK-31, etc.) contacts count THREE points each.\n\n- Only one contact is allowed via each single-channel FM satellite, \nAO-27 (1 phone), SO-41 (1 phone), SO-50 (1 phone), AO-51 (1 phone \nregardless of mode; PBBS-see Pacsats below), ISS (1 phone and 1 \ndigital), PCSat (I, II, etc.) (1 digital), etc.\n\nsnip...\n\n\n\nJohn Price wrote:\n> If you have all ready received this please excuse the dupe. I never\n> saw it in my mailbox from amsat-bb so I don't know if it got\n> forwarded. I sent it to you and the bbs. I should have received it\n> back but never did. Thanks\n> \n> I read the article in the journal concerning field 2007. I understand\n> that on the FM satellites only one contact is allowed for credit. Last\n> year when AO-51 was configured for the QRP operation on the second\n> transponder we were allowed two contacts via AO-51. Since the decision\n> has been made to use Mode-L on this second transponder why not allow\n> two contacts again this year? I see no reason for field day stations\n> to make the effort on Mode-L if they can get there one credit on mode\n> V/u. I guess there is a valid reason for the Mode-L on field day. I\n> would guess it would be to motivate stations to use it. Just my\n> thoughts for your consideration.\n> \n> 73's << John\n> \n> \n\n-- \n\nBruce Paige, KK5DO\n\nAMSAT Director Contests and Awards\n\nARRL Awards Manager (WAS, 5BWAS, VUCC), VE\n\nHouston AMSAT Net - Wed 0100z on W0KIE Intelsat Americas, T1, 6.2/6.8Mhz\nAlso streaming MP3 at http://www.amsatnet.com\n\nLatest satellite news on the ARRL Audio News\nhttp://www.arrl.org\n",
    "attachments": []
}