Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/KEY2ZFCMCDIYYIIOITSQA7WGKRMUD7QP/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "KEY2ZFCMCDIYYIIOITSQA7WGKRMUD7QP",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/FEBDCQJ3PAKZ6UFGO4JPZNHRAZYXDDMR/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "sco (a) sco-inc.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "[email protected]",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: S band downlink on P3E",
    "date": "2006-09-07T16:04:18Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/D2LMUGAGLJ7CF5W2DDQ5WYKUY2PEWN3X/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "\nMy S band equipment barely got any use with AO-40. Why put new higher \nfreqs on Eagle and leave S Band off? Who wants to invest the time and \nmoney into getting gear for a new band when if that sat dies (like \nAO-40) did the next satellite might not even use that Band. Looks \nlike I will stay with PSE for most of my time.\n\nLes W4SCO\nwww.logwindow.com\n\n\nAt 09:45 AM 9/7/2006, Luc Leblanc VE2DWE wrote:\n\n\n\n> > Disappointed to find out that there will not be an S band downlink on\n>Eagle\n> >\n> > Will there be an S band downlink on the P3E bird???\n> >\n> > Sure hate having to fork over more money each time a new satellite goes up\n> > because previous up/downlinks are not being used anymore....makes me wish\n> > for more mode A LEO birds (grin)\n> >\n> >                                     73, Joe W2KJ\n>\n>Another bad move by AMSAT-NA... I don't know if they look at their \n>famous survey about their\n>members opinions here? Probably not could be some one will wake up \n>from lethargy at the next\n>symposium and voices opinions about the maintaining of mode S.\n>\n>If AMSAT-NA is building sats in close circle they just have to \n>openly admitted it even if admission\n>is not a very spoken word they can at least give some explanations \n>on their facts who leads them to\n>scrap mode S?\n>\n>Interference? even if they wants to go higher at the time eagle will \n>be in space the higher\n>frequencies will be as crowded as 2.4 actually. We actually see some \n>decreased in 2.4 ghz apparatus\n>as the public always want the most recent goodies even FRS/GMRS are \n>moving to 5.2 ghz.\n>\n>Suggestion: At the next AMSAT-NA 2006 Space Symposium it will \n>appropriate to voices opinions to the\n>BOD asking them to maintain as planned the mode S.\n>\n>Just to pointed out on a 2005 AMSAT-NA Dayton Hamvention  Jim \n>Sanford WB4GCS made a presentation on\n>eagle project and he said i quote \" S band will be our bread and \n>butter on the downlink\" a\n>prototype of L/S and C/S where planned for the 2005 Symposium at that time.\n>\n>He also mention that the C/C project in on a bleeding edge \n>technology (read experimental) and they\n>where not too sure if they will even be able to make it.\n>\n>Why the C/C band project? he let go this \" this will permit some \n>folks to use it from their\n>balcony\" the cat goes out the bag AGAIN the same ECHO mindings are \n>resurecting...The guy with an HT\n>will be able to make it without using a huge antenna!\n>\n>We will never be able to get rid of this obsession and you know now \n>why they want to move up?  The\n>guy who live on a balcony is living in an apartment complex where S \n>band in unusable. Here is why\n>the C/C project come up. How many actual sat operator are living in \n>apartments? the majority of\n>some of them?\n>\n>Here is the whole logics behind this mode S scrapping. If you read a \n>bit behind the lines you will\n>see he speak about P3E where mode S will be present and he confirm \n>some collaboration between both\n>teams. He also say some of the Eagle builders are funding their own \n>project. From this since 2005\n>we can only see the builders behind the C/C project pushing so hard \n>to a point to get the money\n>previously intended for the 2 S mode TX redirected to their C/C project.\n>\n>Who is driving AMSAT-NA an hollow BOD? an hollow president? Or a \n>third builders manipulating wing\n>who blackmail the BOD?\n>\n>None of them? I let the conclusion yours!\n>\n>P.S.To the BOD its not the best way to attract new members or \n>convince those who leave to rejoin!\n>\n>\"-\"\n>The medium is the message...The content is the audience...;)\n>\n>Luc Leblanc VE2DWE\n>Skype VE2DWE\n>www.qsl.net/ve2dwe\n>Former AMSAT-NA coordonnator and member.\n>_______________________________________________\n>Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n>Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n>Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n\n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}