Email Detail
Show an email
GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/KFEHHI5DE4YDOC3NHDPJM4AEY2227FXR/
{ "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/KFEHHI5DE4YDOC3NHDPJM4AEY2227FXR/", "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/", "message_id": "[email protected]", "message_id_hash": "KFEHHI5DE4YDOC3NHDPJM4AEY2227FXR", "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/Q6RUFOSYPBOWVDYZ3FTZZBMPYI3GI6ZW/", "sender": { "address": "seb (a) wintek.com", "mailman_id": "334792c18f7f4268a405ca1814e93bd0", "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/334792c18f7f4268a405ca1814e93bd0/emails/" }, "sender_name": "Stephen E. Belter", "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Satellite QSO's and LoTW", "date": "2011-10-27T15:20:13Z", "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/Q6RUFOSYPBOWVDYZ3FTZZBMPYI3GI6ZW/", "children": [], "votes": { "likes": 0, "dislikes": 0, "status": "neutral" }, "content": "LoTW satellite convention is the uplink band. \n\nLoTW works well for satellite contacts and VUCC. I'm currently seeing about 20% confirmations. \n\n73, Steve N9IP\n--\n\nOn Oct 27, 2011, at 10:39 AM, \"Jeff Welsh\" <[email protected]> wrote:\n\n> Morning all,\n> \n> I was curious what the standard was for Logbook of the World (LoTW)\n> reporting. Which band do you log your QSO with, Uplink or Downlink?\n> \n> I've been seeing mix results coming back via LoTW, where HRD Log defaults to\n> using the downlink frequency although I've had some QSO's report back using\n> the uplink. I do also log the satellite, mode and propagation type.\n> \n> Thanks,\n> --jeff\n> N3QO\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n\n", "attachments": [] }