Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/KL4ZLEHBFWQFO44PXWSCND2L7QLWLEOA/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "KL4ZLEHBFWQFO44PXWSCND2L7QLWLEOA",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/KL4ZLEHBFWQFO44PXWSCND2L7QLWLEOA/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "ka9p (a) aol.com",
        "mailman_id": "b711aa8ea91e4adaa54a13979a2e97c5",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/b711aa8ea91e4adaa54a13979a2e97c5/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "[email protected]",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Opinions on improving receive for portable ops",
    "date": "2017-03-10T17:24:51Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/4UFJKIV4GIU2LKGSQIP4PRJJZSYU5ETF/"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "I've just started getting on the linear transponders in the last month or  \nso after a 30 year absence from sat work, necessarily with a portable setup, \nand  would be eager to hear experienced opinions on what to do next to  \nimprove receive.\n \nI'm running Cheap Yagis on V(3 el) and U(6 el), diplexers, about 10 feet of \n RG8X, and receiving on an FT817 or 897, usually on FO29 and the XW's,  and \nhave up to 25 watts available for the uplink.\n \nQ's are:\n \n1) with those radios and only about 10 feet of feed line, will a preamp  \nhelp much on 432?\n \n2) If it will, is the 50$ preamp on the AMSAT site a good start? Or?  and\n \n3) With relatively short yagis, will it make a noticeable difference going  \nto circular polarization?  \n \nWRT to 3, I've pretty much exhausted what I can find the internet, but just \n don't have a pragmatic sense for what it will do in terms of evening out  \nreception over, say, an FO 29 pass - I read that you nominally lose 3 dbs  \nmost all the time but may pick up a lot on the deep fades, but still not sure \n how that translates to the real world.\n \nOr is the answer that the set up is marginal enough I need to do it all of  \nthe above if I want reliable communications above about 5 degrees or so?\n \nThanks for the bandwidth and any input.\n \nScott ka9p\n \n \n",
    "attachments": []
}