Email Detail
Show an email
GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/KRRVEWNHHYONJ4XAIERHQ7ZV7KWSCECR/?format=api
{ "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/KRRVEWNHHYONJ4XAIERHQ7ZV7KWSCECR/?format=api", "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api", "message_id": "[email protected]", "message_id_hash": "KRRVEWNHHYONJ4XAIERHQ7ZV7KWSCECR", "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/Y5M4A4Z2DH3RI6G4STVFNVFKGJW67QRR/?format=api", "sender": { "address": "w4as (a) bellsouth.net", "mailman_id": null, "emails": null }, "sender_name": "Sebastian", "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: New Satellite Downlink?", "date": "2010-08-28T00:42:10Z", "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/JMPCNCMVO5OCJCLCD7AEPWBQQJ5XRHHO/?format=api", "children": [], "votes": { "likes": 0, "dislikes": 0, "status": "neutral" }, "content": "Absolutely!\n\n73 de W4AS\n\nOn Aug 27, 2010, at 7:28 PM, George Henry wrote:\n\n> Question: since there is no amateur radio allocation at 149.985, \"we\" \n> (hams) would be asking the Navy, to whom the downlink frequency is \n> allocated, to transmit one-way amateur communications thru this satellite, \n> correct?\n> \n> Doesn't anyone else see potential legal problems involved here?\n> \n> \n> George, KA3HSW\n", "attachments": [] }