Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/KRRVEWNHHYONJ4XAIERHQ7ZV7KWSCECR/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/KRRVEWNHHYONJ4XAIERHQ7ZV7KWSCECR/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "KRRVEWNHHYONJ4XAIERHQ7ZV7KWSCECR",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/Y5M4A4Z2DH3RI6G4STVFNVFKGJW67QRR/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "w4as (a) bellsouth.net",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Sebastian",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: New Satellite Downlink?",
    "date": "2010-08-28T00:42:10Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/JMPCNCMVO5OCJCLCD7AEPWBQQJ5XRHHO/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Absolutely!\n\n73 de W4AS\n\nOn Aug 27, 2010, at 7:28 PM, George Henry wrote:\n\n> Question:  since there is no amateur radio allocation at 149.985, \"we\" \n> (hams) would be asking the Navy, to whom the downlink frequency is \n> allocated, to transmit one-way amateur communications thru this satellite, \n> correct?\n> \n> Doesn't anyone else see potential legal problems involved here?\n> \n> \n> George, KA3HSW\n",
    "attachments": []
}