Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/KTJTPXJWYKMEEEVXHMDZH7KEH2UFXKZZ/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/KTJTPXJWYKMEEEVXHMDZH7KEH2UFXKZZ/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "CAP7QzkNPqja_SuQqiZNHudRkNE6suO8UHBtpB1QZcQRWVPJgrg@mail.gmail.com",
    "message_id_hash": "KTJTPXJWYKMEEEVXHMDZH7KEH2UFXKZZ",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/S4CMG622BRGDGEG5V3KRPRUNIFMAWKKB/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "va6bmj (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "f948df117a6d4898a372c2956f9ec505",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/f948df117a6d4898a372c2956f9ec505/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "B J",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] Observations on tracking programs",
    "date": "2018-09-02T06:09:20Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/S4CMG622BRGDGEG5V3KRPRUNIFMAWKKB/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/PKEJU574OTPL4JC4IFQZR5Y3WGMRMAUD/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "On 9/2/18, Wendy and Terry Osborne <[email protected]> wrote:\n> Hi Folks,\n>\n> I have recently been following AO-91 with a selection of tracking programs\n> and confirming\n> the results with observations of the downlink.\n>\n> Using the same QTH location and Keps, I found the following:\n> The AMSAT-NA online tracking page is pretty accurate. See:\n> https://www.amsat.org/track/index.php\n> Heavens-above.com is also pretty good. See: https://www.heavens-above.com\n> SatPC32, Orbitron, InstantTrack, and Quiktrak are pretty good and give the\n> same results as the “On-Line” trackers.\n>\n> Nova is about 5 minutes ahead.\n> GPredict is about 5 minutes behind.\n>\n> Has anyone else noticed this?\n\n<snip>\n\nI've never worked AO-91, so I can't comment on that.  I run Gpredict\non a Linux ThinkPad and i found that it's been accurate for satellites\nsuch as FO-29.\n\n73s\n\nBernhard VA6BMJ\n",
    "attachments": []
}