Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/KVHTNFQTCFRMOMHES5BMC6GKIPBYC26K/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "KVHTNFQTCFRMOMHES5BMC6GKIPBYC26K",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/QS4ZNLSO25FWR4LQYKRNIYRQWKS6ROD4/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "kq6ea (a) verizon.net",
        "mailman_id": "d2ef86d749ee450c8ad9ffc9f2e15cad",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/d2ef86d749ee450c8ad9ffc9f2e15cad/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Jim Jerzycke",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] RTL-SDR downlink",
    "date": "2016-06-16T21:15:14Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/ZBL5IQZPO77SAO4NE53B4MKFHNJREM7S/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "I did some experimentation with the $20 dongle vs the FunCube dongle for \nreceiving weather satellites.\n\nIf you live in an RF dense area, like here in Southern California, they \nBOTH benefit from having some front-end filtering added.\n\nOther wise you have to turn the RF gain down quite a bit on both of them \nto prevent 'break through' from strong signals that can be may MHz away \nfrom your band of interest.\n\nIn my case, I used an SSB Electronik 2 Meter preamp with an old M2 2 \nMeter Eggbeater antenna. I could get reasonable copy above 10*~15* \nelevation with just the dongle and antenna, but suffered from strong \nsignal break through. If I turned the RF gain down to where the \ninterfering signals no longer broke through, it cut my reception down to \nmaybe 25*~30* elevation.\n\nWith the SSB preamp and it's built-in helical filter, even operating at \n137 MHz, the difference was staggering, and I could get good copy down \nto 5* or so.\n\nThe only other SDR I played with for a while was the HackRF, which I \nfound to be unsuitable for what I was looking for. Despite the hype \nbehind it, it's still an 8-bit unit with limited dynamic range.\n\nYMMV!\n\n73, Jim  KQ6EA\n\nOn 06/16/2016 08:33 PM, Peter Laws wrote:\n> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)\n> <[email protected]> wrote:\n>> Unfortunately there isn't anything in the middle ground between these\n>> dongles and devices like the\n>\n> The $20 versions are well worth the effort if you've never played with\n> an SDR of any sort before.  For satellite downlinks?  Dunno, never\n> tried.  Surely as you describe!\n>\n> Has anyone done any kind of \"shoot out\" comparing the cheapos to the\n> real ones or even between the real ones (FCD, SDRPlay)?  Before I\n> plunk down $200, I'd like to see what I'm getting ...  over and above\n> what my $20 dongle can do, of course.  :-)  I read what you typed, but\n> I'd like to see numbers.\n>\n>\n>\n>\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}