Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/L5NRUKX2I5CH26QYFSVJNW7FA4SGZ4JP/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "L5NRUKX2I5CH26QYFSVJNW7FA4SGZ4JP",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/L5NRUKX2I5CH26QYFSVJNW7FA4SGZ4JP/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "ab2cj (a) optonline.net",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "ab2cj",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Signalink Modification for 9600 baud",
    "date": "2017-10-11T17:49:44Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/DPOAMIFU4WQIKOYEP52TAENDC6D5RZ3V/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "All:\n\nHas anyone modified a Signalink interface to work 9600 baud satellites? \nIt's my understanding that transformers and other isolation components \nintroduce phase distortion making the unit inoperable for 9600 baud \noperation.\n\nHas anyone tried the stock USB unit with the built-in sound card on \nterrestrial 9600 baud packet?\n\nTony -K2MO\n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}