Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/L6BLOZ3CHVD5QE652D6X2AGNONDBWIR4/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/L6BLOZ3CHVD5QE652D6X2AGNONDBWIR4/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "L6BLOZ3CHVD5QE652D6X2AGNONDBWIR4",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/Y5TW6SRJU3AGVNSUPCR52RWB5AI67I27/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "nate (a) natetech.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Nate Duehr",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Measuring the ADC output of a sound card",
    "date": "2007-07-30T05:47:49Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/CTHBARH43HCUQL74QNOY4P3TQSQPOARU/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/IWZQUZAIM66ELUPHI7IEKNGIFGF6F4US/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "\nOn Jul 28, 2007, at 7:03 PM, Alan P. Biddle wrote:\n\n> Simon,\n>\n> What brought this question about is a test with a new soundcard, a  \n> SignaLink\n> USB.  It have noticed that it is somewhat less sensitive than some  \n> previous\n> cards I have used, which readily saturated unless I reduced the signal\n> input.  The SignaLink USB does not saturate, even at full gain, in  \n> the same\n> application, which raises the question of whether I have enough  \n> signal.\n> There are some issues which can be in the programs and CODECS,  \n> which is why\n> I was wondering about something which gives you the raw ADC data.\n\nYou actually got one?  My two have been on order since April, and  \nnothing but a postcard saying they were \"having trouble getting their  \naluminum boxes\" from their supplier.\n\nI don't think that's the whole story -- hundreds of places will make  \ncustom aluminum.\n\nIf you just received that unit, perhaps you (and others) should  \ncompare the guts of an older one with a newer one.  Especially if  \nother reports of odd level issues start to show up.\n\nIf you have had it a while, disregard...\n\n--\nNate Duehr, WY0X\[email protected]\n\n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}