Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/LDBB54TZBA4WNFOMY5APUXXAZ6DQMZ45/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "LDBB54TZBA4WNFOMY5APUXXAZ6DQMZ45",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/LDBB54TZBA4WNFOMY5APUXXAZ6DQMZ45/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "n4ufo (a) yahoo.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Kevin M",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] Icon ID-51A for satellite",
    "date": "2016-01-22T01:24:22Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "I have to agree with you, Pavel... I actually tried using two Baofengs, a UV-3R+ and a UV-5R, with an Arrow antenna to run full duplex on SO-50. Did not matter the configuration, I experienced terrible desense on receive. I abandoned trying to operate with two HTs and went back to one HT and semi-duplex operations. \n\n73, Kevin N4UFO\n\n---------------------Hi,\n\nI don't recommend the Baofengs for TX side in 2m, many of them has a \nnotable spectral \"impurity\" with very strong 3rd harmonic on 70cm, see this: \n",
    "attachments": []
}