Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/LFL7773HX6ZA465BW3UC3PFE4JY5XZIK/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "LFL7773HX6ZA465BW3UC3PFE4JY5XZIK",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/GOMKKP3BMDLZKCFPEJH3KZWIXI7KDQGB/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "sats (a) pe1rdw.demon.nl",
        "mailman_id": "e20cf29fc4414064823663a29fbe7306",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/e20cf29fc4414064823663a29fbe7306/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "PE1RDW",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Improving performance of packet communications through the ISS",
    "date": "2013-06-10T15:31:00Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/7NM62Y4DUWZGROGJ5S54NQDRR44TSGCZ/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "PASSALL does not work with AGWPE but if you want to improve reception of  \naprs packets from ISS the best option might be dire wolf, it is a direct  \nreplacement for agwpe and tries to fix reception errors.\nIt will very likely out preform any hardware tnc for aprs use.\n\nAnother alternative is uz7ho soundmodem, it is designed to handle shifted  \nand distorted tones on hf and could help at iss too, this is also a dropin  \nreplacement for agwpe.\n\n-- \n73 Andre PE1RDW\n\n\nFrom: [email protected]\nTo: [email protected], [email protected]\nCc:\nSubject: [amsat-bb] Re: Improving performance of packet communications  \nthrough the ISS\nDate: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 14:46:13 +0200\n\nLes...\n\nI forget the command...maybe PASSALL? Typically the default settings only\ndisplay complete verified packets...I think if you turn it on it will\ndisplay partial and unverified packets which allows you to see everything\nreceived even if  incomplete and can you can figure out the content.\n\nRoger\nWA1KAT\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n-----Original Message-----\nFrom: Les Rayburn <[email protected]>\nTo: AMSAT Mailing List <[email protected]>\nSent: Mon, Jun 10, 2013 12:39 am\nSubject: [amsat-bb] Improving performance of packet communications through\nthe ISS\n\n\nI've got my Icom IC-910H working with it's SignaLink interface, through\nPacket Engine Pro and UISS. I've been able to receive lots of stations\nthrough the ISS, and managed to have short QSOs with a couple. Fun!\n\nBut I notice that this combination seems to do a poor job of decoding\nweak signals. I hear packets in the speaker that seem plenty strong\nenough to decode, but they don't show up on UISS.\n\nI'm wondering if I used a traditional TNC, such as a Kantronics unit, if\nI'd get better performance? Does anyone in the group have any experience\nalong these lines? Or could someone provide other suggestions on how to\nimprove my ability to communicate through the ISS?\n\nThanks in advance. Having a ball on the birds.\n",
    "attachments": []
}