Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/LFYE4RF7Q43D5QC5I3OB6DTKDPCJCUXP/
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/LFYE4RF7Q43D5QC5I3OB6DTKDPCJCUXP/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "LFYE4RF7Q43D5QC5I3OB6DTKDPCJCUXP",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/6A3YS5BTMAQBVAOWHLIUK64I4ARV63UX/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "dphelps1 (a) ameritech.net",
        "mailman_id": "02d31c8abc95431baa6ffe83ac4ec542",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/02d31c8abc95431baa6ffe83ac4ec542/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "Douglas Phelps",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] FUNcube-1 AO73 Mode change",
    "date": "2014-11-17T00:03:23Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/GG3LTV2JP64OUFQEDNJ25MRDWRJVJENB/",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Jerry,\n\nI understand.  Thanks\n\n\n>________________________________\n> From: Jerry Buxton <[email protected]>\n>To: [email protected] \n>Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2014 11:14 AM\n>Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] FUNcube-1 AO73 Mode change\n> \n>\n>Doug,\n>\n>(I included amsat-bb on this response so that everyone knows where we \n>still appear to be held in regard to U.S. regulations)\n>\n>I don't believe that the mass properties for Fox-1 have been published \n>yet, although you could certainly take a look at the Symposium \n>Proceedings from 2011-2014 to see if I missed something.  Since I turn \n>in the papers on Fox-1 for those publications, I believe I \"know it all\" \n>but hey, that's 4 years to remember. :-)\n>\n>Being that control of amateur radio satellites was just transitioned \n>from ITAR to EAR, and we have not had a chance to get a legal opinion \n>regarding EAR and the \"items subject to EAR\" in regard to the \"deemed \n>export\" rules; while I have just taken a look at sections 734.2 and \n>734.3 of the EAR to see if I could quickly glean something, I have to \n>say that I feel that it does restrict me from talking openly about the \n>information you requested in your questions 2 and 3.\n>\n>That having been said, while it appears that I could divulge it to a \n>\"U.S. Person\" that would mean that we have to discuss it privately and \n>you would have to convince me that you qualify as a \"U.S. Person\" and \n>then you become held responsible for protecting that information, and so on.\n>\n>So rather than open a can of worms (or stick my neck on the Federal \n>chopping block), I would rather just say that I can't share that \n>information with you and ask if you might be able to determine what you \n>need to know by asking me something in a way that does not seek specific \n>information like that, or perhaps make some assumptions yourself.\n>\n>I am sorry, it is the way we have to conduct ourselves in this activity \n>these days and until we get some strong advice on the legal aspects of \n>what can and can't be discussed for fear of violating \"deemed \n>exports\"... it appears to be similar to ITAR in that regard.\n>\n>73\n>\n>Jerry Buxton, NØJY\n>\n>On 11/14/2014 19:53, Jerry Buxton wrote:\n>> Hi Doug,\n>>\n>> I got your email but I have not responded because I have not had \"a \n>> good time for you to call\" yet.  I've been pretty busy with Foxes, and \n>> you did not indicate that there was a deadline to respond.\n>> If this is what you are interested in knowing, I will let you know soon.\n>> The answer to 1 is yes, and none.\n>> I'll have to dig in the docs for the answers to 2 and 3, I don't have \n>> that information right on hand.\n>>\n>> Jerry Buxton, NØJY\n>>\n>> On 11/14/2014 16:54, Douglas Phelps wrote:\n>>> I am working on a proposal to the Board of Directors and need some \n>>> information.  I have tried Emailing the Engineering Team but have not \n>>> gotten a responce.  Perhaps my Emails are not making it through the \n>>> system.  I need answers to the following (approx answer are ok):\n>>>\n>>> 1 - Is Fox 1C carrying any experiments and, if yes, how many empty \n>>> card slots remain?\n>>>\n>>> 2 - Approximate weight, in grams, of Fox 1C without the experiment \n>>> cards.\n>>>\n>>> 3 - Approximate weight of the ballast added to Fox 1A?\n>>>\n>>> I would appreciate the answers to the above questions.\n>>>\n>>> Thank You,\n>>>\n>>> Doug\n>>> K9DLP\n>>> AMSAT Member\n>>> _______________________________________________\n>>> Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n>>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. \n>>> Opinions expressed\n>>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views \n>>> of AMSAT-NA.\n>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite \n>>> program!\n>>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n>\n>\n>\n>>>\n>>>\n>>\n>> _______________________________________________\n>> Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. \n>> Opinions expressed\n>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views \n>> of AMSAT-NA.\n>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite \n>> program!\n>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>>\n>>\n>\n>_______________________________________________\n>Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n>to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed\n>are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.\n>Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n>Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n>\n",
    "attachments": []
}