Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/LHTSMC2KRQLWYTL23PF6QTOT2H4VDG6D/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "LHTSMC2KRQLWYTL23PF6QTOT2H4VDG6D",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/5UP2H4GKM4KWEIIO6TNPLR2IPHXTTP52/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "broberts (a) mta.ca",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Bruce Robertson",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: S band and Eagle: an appeal for a higher level\tdiscussion",
    "date": "2006-09-08T11:40:03Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/GFX6KYPSRPXSVBXCXOTNSVC36ZIU46RS/",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Quoting Joe Westbrook <[email protected]>:\n\n> Bruce:\n> Are you suggesting that \"Please,, those of you who are qualified and \n> competent\"  are the only folks who are worthy of a dissenting view\n> regarding \n> this topic?  Please, that is precisely the attitude that turn folks off\n> of \n> AMSAT-NA, that elitist attitude has no place in a HOBBY.  Particularly\n> when \n> we ALL contribute to the construction of the satellites.  It just\n> happens \n> that I am a professional Network Engineer (Trainer) for a\n> Telecommunications \n> Company.\n\nSorry if I seemed rude. I had meant the description of people who are\nqualified and competent to contrast with myself, whom I described before\nthat quotation as \"not skilled or qualified\". And this is a statement I\nwill stand by firmly :-)\n\nNor did I mean to suggest that people so defined are the only ones whose\nopinions matter. After all, I offered my opinion! I just know that some of\nthe people who were writing, like yourself, have more of a means to analyze\nthings, do some math, consult industry predictions, etc. And I'd like you\n(pl.) to prove wrong the contention that S band will be a sewer in X years.\nLet's all dispassionately read the article in the Journal, the material in\nEaglepedia and see if we can find problems with it.\n\nFor instance, you argue that 5 GHz will be just as 'polluted' as 2.4 in the\nnear future. I'd consider it a personal favour, and I'm sure many others\nwould, if you were to cite what you consider authoritative studies to that\neffect. \n\nOne way or another, with the kind help of the people on this list and\nexcellent on-air advice, I'm slowly building up my S band station and\nlooking forward to my first HEO contacts on P3E.\n\n73, Bruce\nVE9QRP\n",
    "attachments": []
}