Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/LJKFECWHIL5XZJMWQ2I3FZORALI32MOT/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/LJKFECWHIL5XZJMWQ2I3FZORALI32MOT/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "BN1PR06MB341A6FEEF2CF0BBC7E9C3588A730@BN1PR06MB341.namprd06.prod.outlook.com",
    "message_id_hash": "LJKFECWHIL5XZJMWQ2I3FZORALI32MOT",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/2KEJRZIQE4KNADJVN56XSTA6R22AFOHJ/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "gary_mayfield (a) hotmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "fe442cdc520e4857a9168b9182091295",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/fe442cdc520e4857a9168b9182091295/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Gary",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] FT-736R vs. TS-2000X",
    "date": "2016-05-12T02:57:26Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/75ETDE4G56ILKXYTCC4WOD3SWSQNYALP/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Doesn't the TS-2000X have a birdie on the SO-50 downlink frequency?\n\n73,\nJoe kk0sd\n\n________________________________________\nFrom: AMSAT-BB <[email protected]> on behalf of Jim Walls <[email protected]>\nSent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 3:57 PM\nTo: Christopher Maness; [email protected]\nSubject: Re: [amsat-bb] FT-736R vs. TS-2000X\n\n The 736 also allows full duplex on FM or SSB birds.\n The computer control on the 736 is far more limited as it is one way only\n- computer to the radio only.  You can't tune the radio with the knob and\nhave the computer know what you are doing.\n The 736 has a history of power supply failures.\n\n With all that said, I really like my 736.\n\n Jim - K6CCC\n\n\n\n\n\n -------- Original Message --------\n> From: \"Christopher Maness\" <[email protected]>\n> Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 1:42 PM\n> To: \"[email protected]\" <[email protected]>\n> Subject: [amsat-bb] FT-736R vs. TS-2000X\n>\n> I have recently picked up both a TS-2000X and a FT-736R in a sale. I plan\non selling one as I already have too many radios. I am not real active on\nthe birds, but I occasionally get on, and usually work them for my club on\nFD. I have done some pro/con research on these radios, and I am slightly\nleaning towards the TS-2000X. I have heard that the FT-736R is a better\nradio, but is it so much better that it beats all the features that the\nTS-2000X has. I like the fact that it has a sub receiver so that I can work\nthe FM birds full duplex, and I also like that it has a full 100W on 2m. I\nam thinking that if the receiver on the 2000 is deaf on VHF/UHF, I can add\na preamp. Also, I have worked the June VHF/UHF contest in the bast an am\nconsidering working it again this June.\n>\n> Any thoughts?\n> Regards,\n> Chris KQ6UP\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.\nOpinions expressed\n> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of\nAMSAT-NA.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite\nprogram!\n> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n\n\n_______________________________________________\nSent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\nto all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed\nare solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.\nNot an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\nSubscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n",
    "attachments": []
}