Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/LNCSAREI566DB4CZBXILV4VZVVEXAAF2/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "1197577968.6495.3.camel@willow",
    "message_id_hash": "LNCSAREI566DB4CZBXILV4VZVVEXAAF2",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/WSBTL6EJCVUOYGJVRI73BMHSO6IRYT4S/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "john (a) manchester.ac.uk",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "John Heaton",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Phase 4 versus Eagle",
    "date": "2007-12-13T20:32:48Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/HIL2GBEYVLQSYV2AXBZHSGSSCIA6N2RZ/",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 12:15 -0500, [email protected] wrote:\n> after AO-40 blew I would find it hard to believe that they would \n> trust the success of their mission with another AO40 type sat \n> onboard. Are they aware of our past track record?\n\n>From what I remember, the AO-40 launch and initial deployment was almost\nperfect.  It was some time after initial deploymment that AO-40 went\nwrong.  I still have the launch on Video and will check if you want.\n\nJohn\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}