Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/LNYIVVFP56V6NQOHT5E37X6EWRJKU6NH/
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/LNYIVVFP56V6NQOHT5E37X6EWRJKU6NH/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "LNYIVVFP56V6NQOHT5E37X6EWRJKU6NH",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/LNYIVVFP56V6NQOHT5E37X6EWRJKU6NH/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "clintbrad4d (a) earthlink.net",
        "mailman_id": "34e9746137e540a4914cb0d9e0db52fd",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/34e9746137e540a4914cb0d9e0db52fd/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "Clint Bradford",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: AO=51 and Yagi Polarization",
    "date": "2008-01-02T21:35:43Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/AOSID7NLQSWLIRWZWV7DJ6XL5ICTUDM7/"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "You are talking about the two satellites I regularly access using a  \nhandheld radio at about 2.5W and either an Arrow dual-band antenna or  \nsimply a longer duck.\n\nIn my experiences, orienting the Arrow 90 degrees in either direction  \ngives no discernable improvement on the RX signal: It's clear and  \nwonderful no matter how I twist the Arrow.\n\nDo the concepts os LHCP and RHCP come into play when you are trying  \nto access lower elevation passes? AO-51 and SO-50 are so darned easy  \nto hit with minimal equipment...and there is certainly NO \"large  \ndifference between using RHCP and LHCP when listening to the  \ndownlink\" as mentioned.\n\nClint Bradford, K6LCS\n909-2421-7666\n\nOn Jan 2, 2008, at 11:14 AM, [email protected] wrote:\n\n> ...there can be a large difference between using RHCP and LHCP\n> when listening to the downlink. That is one of the resons for at  \n> lot of\n> us to have the possibility to switch between RHCP and LHCP...\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}