Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/LPEVLW4YWHJWRVMAQFGQO5IJ3IBK7ZT5/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "019b01c8dbe2$8be2fd60$0202a8c0@K5HV",
    "message_id_hash": "LPEVLW4YWHJWRVMAQFGQO5IJ3IBK7ZT5",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/YOAPIE7VUKZ2JA3JA4T2Q52TRCISAIPG/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "tower2 (a) stx.rr.com",
        "mailman_id": "1cd4fee8700c4fad9e518636e9db95c4",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/1cd4fee8700c4fad9e518636e9db95c4/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "HARVEY VORDENBAUM",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Best type of coax to use ... in ... AMSAT-BB Digest,\tVol 3, Issue 326",
    "date": "2008-07-02T01:25:38Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/YOAPIE7VUKZ2JA3JA4T2Q52TRCISAIPG/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/QWKXFRT7RP5QZ6KJJNAVL63NSYW3GPR3/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Someone mentioned the 2-piece type N connector for 9913 type coax.  Does \nanyone have the trimming dimensions for those?  I had to make up my own and \nwonder how good they are.\n73, Harvey\nK5HV\n\n----- Original Message ----- \nFrom: \"joe cassano aka jmario\" <[email protected]>\nTo: <[email protected]>\nSent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 12:38 PM\nSubject: [amsat-bb] Re: Best type of coax to use ... in ... AMSAT-BB Digest, \nVol 3, Issue 326\n\n\nInstalling a classic clamp type N connector like the Amphenol 82-202\n(UG-21D/U) on flexible coax with a real copper center conductor\n(RG-8,RG-213) is both easier and has a much higher probability of\nsuccess than installing the common PL-259.  You only have to make one\neasily accessible solder connection.\n\nTake a look at\nhttp://www.amphenolrf.com/products/assemblyInstructions/280.pdf to see\nwhat is involved in attaching classic clamp style N connector.\n\nYou also might want to read the reviews listed here:\nhttp://www.eham.net/reviews/products/7 before you make any purchase\ndecisions.\n\n\nRegards,\nJoeC - K3FMA\n\n> ------------------------------\n>\n> Message: 12\n> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 19:49:00 -0500\n> From: Ronald Nutter <[email protected]>\n> Subject: [amsat-bb]  Best type of coax to use between preamps and\n> antennas\n> To: [email protected]\n> Message-ID: <[email protected]>\n> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed\n>\n> After problems I had on Field Day in trying to operate the satellites, I\n> am looking to upgrade the coax I use between the preamps and the\n> antennas.  I am using 9913FX from the IC-910H and the preamps.  I had\n> been using RG Mini 8/U for the connection between the preamps and\n> antennas.  Should I also use 9913FX between the preamps and the\n> antennas?  The run between the radio and the preamp is 50 ft.  The run\n> from the preamp to the antennas is about 10 - 15 ft depending on where I\n> set the antennas up.  I am concerned about how flexible the 9913FX would\n> be in terms of the antennas rotating back and forth.  I was planning on\n> ordering the cables pre-made from CableXperts since working with N\n> connectors isnt my strong point and dont want to worry about my\n> soldering and having a good connection on both ends of the cable.\n>\n> Any suggestions appreciated.\n>\n> Thanks,\n> Ron\n> KA4KYI\n>\n>\n_______________________________________________\nSent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\nNot an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\nSubscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb \n\n",
    "attachments": []
}