Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/LT3ZOAFREI6Z5WNLAAT3G4XF4PS2RVVB/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "001701c6cb76$8bff9480$0b00a8c0@master",
    "message_id_hash": "LT3ZOAFREI6Z5WNLAAT3G4XF4PS2RVVB",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/P7RT2WZYNQ3KBXXJUKETXFWNNAWNBNAU/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "sv1bsx (a) yahoo.gr",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "SV1BSX",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: FO-29 Minimum antenna system to work.",
    "date": "2006-08-29T14:22:18Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/P7RT2WZYNQ3KBXXJUKETXFWNNAWNBNAU/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/QJA7VZMHAE6DX3Q4YYHNPNCPPQJPS3IB/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Hi Joe,\n\nyes, I had tried to listen the FO-29's downlink with QFH-antennas  on\nseveral arrangements and\nI noticed that the QFH is the most reliable omni Satellite-antenna.\n The downlink signal was superior  in comparison with other omni-antennas.\n(My QFH was based on *excellent* articles of  I8CVS & W3KH respectively,\nwith infinity baluns).\n\nThe most important point (as usual) it's the length of coaxial between QFH\nand\nReceiver. On my experiments onto my roof  by using just a few feet of\ncables, the\nQFH was pretty good for FO-29 reception. The problem began when connected\nwith my long-long coaxial cable up to my shack, even in case which I used\ngood\nquality cable. It's obvious that, the QFH with long coaxial needs a preamp,\nanyhow.\nBut in this case, you need hard work in order to be able to achieve the best\nresult for good reception.\n\n  However, even if QFH is the best Satellite omni-antenna, my experiments\nproved me that for Linear birds, like FO-29, the QFH is worst than any small\nUHF-Yagi (ie 5-7 El). The superiority of Yagi antenna is obvious especially\nin\nweak signals (Q5 upto 1-3 S Unit).\n On the other hand, for FM-birds the QFH is good enough and that probably\nhas to do with limiter-stages in FM-mode receivers. Just keep in mind.\n\n73, Mak SV1BSX\n\n\[email protected]\nhttp://www.qsl.net/sv1bsx\n\nLAN eMail-Server: This Email has been checked by NAV 2005\n                                               Virus Free\n\n\n\n\n----- Original Message -----\nFrom: \"Joe Leikhim\" <[email protected]>\nTo: <[email protected]>\nSent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 8:38 AM\nSubject: [amsat-bb] FO-29 Minimum antenna system to work.\n\n\nHas anyone tried working FO-29 with egg beaters or other omni\ndirectional array? I have plenty of power and a good preamp. I have yet\nto put my yagi's together (after my last move) and wonder if I can\ncobble together something that will work.\n\n--\nJoe Leikhim K4SAT\n\"The RFI-EMI-GUY\"©\n\n\"Treason doth never prosper: what's the reason?\nFor if it prosper, none dare call it treason.\"\n\n\"Follow The Money\"  ;-P\n\n\n_______________________________________________\nSent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\nNot an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\nSubscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n\n\n\n\n__________________________________________________\n×ñçóéìïðïéåßôå Yahoo!;\nÂáñåèÞêáôå ôá åíï÷ëçôéêÜ ìçíýìáôá (spam);   Ôï Yahoo! Mail äéáèÝôåé ôçí êáëýôåñç äõíáôÞ ðñïóôáóßá êáôÜ ôùí åíï÷ëçôéêþí ìçíõìÜôùí  \nhttp://mail.yahoo.gr \n",
    "attachments": []
}