Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/LYYPVW27ZUIIROU3UN4SH4Z6BT76H7UW/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "000001c740e3$5910b710$9a011a2c@AI7WDesk",
    "message_id_hash": "LYYPVW27ZUIIROU3UN4SH4Z6BT76H7UW",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/LYYPVW27ZUIIROU3UN4SH4Z6BT76H7UW/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "ai7w (a) comcast.net",
        "mailman_id": "f9830da2aea14abaa8a3f7743a14eb9e",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/f9830da2aea14abaa8a3f7743a14eb9e/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "Steve",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Satellites and the LoTW",
    "date": "2007-01-26T00:45:58Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/3IUMRERJT5ZTKJUBBNSMO3BLR7CTJIKY/",
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/IEDAJXDNTAR4UHF75CR7KXVCE6HDGQNE/"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "In the Sept. 2005 QST magazine, Ward Silver N0AX writes that (as of that\ndate) the LOTW database holds 14 million QSO's under 15,000 different call\nsigns.\nI don't know how big the eQSL database is but it looks to me like LOTW has a\nstrong marketplace position.\n\nI agree that eQSL is probably easier to use but I believe that's because of\nthe tighter security standards of LOTW. Thousands of hams have managed to\nuse LOTW successfully, so I'd say it's probably user friendly enough to be\npractical.\n\nI'm sure eQSL has a place in amateur radio, I just don't think it's a\nreplacement for LOTW.\n\nSteve .. AI7W\nlm #2270\n\n\n-----Original Message-----\nFrom: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]\nSent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 16:21 UTC\nTo: Steve\nSubject: RE: [amsat-bb] Re: Satellites and the LoTW\n\n\n\nwell eQSL is much much easier to use and they have their own awards.\ni have attempted a couple of times to upload to LOTW. eQSL even sends\nme an email when a card comes into their system. The marketplace may\ndecide the issue here between LOTW and eQSL. I love eQSL and hate\n(not quite) using LOTW.\n\nI am giving priority in my logging software programs development to\neQSL before LOTW.\n\nLes\n\nAt 10:32 AM 1/25/2007, you wrote:\n>\"eQSL\" is not accepted for DXCC or other ARRL award programs.\n>It doesn't come up to the ARRL's standards for security and accuracy.\n>\n>Steve .. AI7W\n>lm #2270\n>\n>\n>-----Original Message-----\n>From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On\n>Behalf Of [email protected]\n>Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 05:51 UTC\n>To: [email protected]\n>Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Satellites and the LoTW\n>\n>\n>\n>There is an excellent substitute for LOTW. It is called \"eQSL.cc\".\n>It even will print and mail you a real card plus you can download or\n>upload the image of the real card.\n>It is very easy to use and i prefer it over LOTW.\n>\n>Les W4SCO\n>www.logwindow.com\n>www.myweblinks.cc\n>\n>\n>Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n\n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}