Email Detail
Show an email
GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/MCNDKHQDEFRL6STGYTEGWGOJYSZKZQNY/
{ "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/MCNDKHQDEFRL6STGYTEGWGOJYSZKZQNY/", "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/", "message_id": "CANq+eyU5E=vKoyQYkm_DzjosBeWXBm2pF+ja+DAuFCC+GQS2Eg@mail.gmail.com", "message_id_hash": "MCNDKHQDEFRL6STGYTEGWGOJYSZKZQNY", "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/B6LZU5SGG7TUUJXRHDKUCKTQVW3XLG5G/", "sender": { "address": "dave (a) druidnetworks.com", "mailman_id": "3b01b396750a47f287ea0c65babd40ea", "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/3b01b396750a47f287ea0c65babd40ea/emails/" }, "sender_name": "David Swanson", "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] Optimal QTH? (Re: WAS-SAT 38 Years Later!", "date": "2016-06-07T21:03:19Z", "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/B6LZU5SGG7TUUJXRHDKUCKTQVW3XLG5G/", "children": [ "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/MSU3G3S2WFGJBIAOLVYXZCWO7RJL76ZN/" ], "votes": { "likes": 0, "dislikes": 0, "status": "neutral" }, "content": "I'm not too far away from you in EM34, and I got WAS completed in about 8\nmonths of pretty hard operating. I had to set a few schedules, and catch a\nfew portable operators at the right time - but those of us in the\nsouth-central part of the county are in a pretty good spot for WAS. It's\ndefinitely doable on the LEO's in short order, if you operate pretty\nheavily for a while.\n\nOn Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Peter Laws <[email protected]> wrote:\n\n> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 10:02 AM, R.T.Liddy <[email protected]> wrote:\n> > SAT Operators,\n> > I just received my WAS-Satellite Award #341 which ended upcovering 38\n> years of casual operating!\n>\n> Congrats!\n>\n> I am currently awaiting an Arrow from Arrow HQ and hope to start\n> making contacts. Not sure I can wait 38 years, however. :-)\n>\n> I am in EM15, so shouldn't have much trouble even with LEOs, but has\n> anyone calculated the \"optimal\" area for WAS QSOs? I would expect\n> it's pretty close to where I am but footprint is a factor, too.\n> Anyone figured it out?\n>\n>\n>\n>\n> --\n> Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train!\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions\n> expressed\n> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of\n> AMSAT-NA.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n", "attachments": [] }