Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/MCZLPVZS6V7U3B3GC2MNWLGEX67JN7HY/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "MCZLPVZS6V7U3B3GC2MNWLGEX67JN7HY",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/MCZLPVZS6V7U3B3GC2MNWLGEX67JN7HY/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "lucleblanc6 (a) videotron.ca",
        "mailman_id": "9e00802147284c40880480833e06c230",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/9e00802147284c40880480833e06c230/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Luc Leblanc",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: [Satellites] RE: AMSAT???",
    "date": "2009-01-26T19:20:05Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/R6A2JCZSKNNUVHVNWWNMPYKNCAJYXTEQ/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": ">From e-ham net where the action shiffted to:)\n\nMy comments in the text\n\n> Posted By KD5NJR\n> \n> I believe there is a single paid employee (Martha) in \"all of AMSAT\".  \n> \nYep we here in Canada we lost at RAC the equivalent in the name of  the late Debbie Norman VA3RGM\nGeneral Manager. A dedicated women as Martha \n> \n> It's just a volunteer organization.  They have their hands full just getting the newsletter out.  \n> \nProbably the only one AMSAT membership tangible assets actually\n> \n> Here below is one way to explain the inaction you perceive.  \n> \n> \n> \n> 1) The early OSCARS rode for free as balast.\nThere was also ballast in the last JAXA launch... \n> 2) Now they don't.  Mass = money.\nIf we add up the total mass of the cubes already in space EAGLE AND P3E should already be in space \n> 3a) Donors = money\nYep but they need more than a journal and an annual general meeting/show\n> 3b) Donations = eager (cranky?) satellite users.\nYep they want to make QSO ON AN AMATEUR SATELLITE FOR MORE THAN 15 MINUTES PER PASS \n> 4) These users want long (hours, not seconds), DX QSOs.\nYep see above \n> 5a) So, there is a lot of pressure to employ frequencies and modulation schemes that can service the greatest number of users / kilogram.  And they want that package in a high (long duration) orbit.\nYep we agree here also \n> 5b) There is resistance to above when it means building / buying new ground station equipment for the end users.  Years were spent in discussion on these points.\n> \nStay in a KISS configuration and keep the fancy and exotic mode for a later launch\n> \n> 6) The lab was mothballed for a while after AO-40.\n> \nI keep mine away from mothballed as i recycle them on LEO'S and it helps to justify the junk in my backyard to my wife eyes...we never \nknow! see this http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0338706/    A good week end film to watch;) \n> \n> From when I got my ticket until last year (trying to cut back on costs) I was paid up on ARRL and AMSAT.  Did the FMsat and PCSat thing.  I have my IC-910.  Listening for a clear game plan.\n> Then, I'll resume donations and collecting hardware for my station.\n> \nWho comes first syndrome the egg or the chicken? \n> \n> 73\n> \n> Scott\n> \n> KD5NJR\n> \n> \n\n\n\n\"-\"\n\n\nLuc Leblanc VE2DWE\nSkype VE2DWE\nwww.qsl.net/ve2dwe\nWAC BASIC CW PHONE SATELLITE\n\n \n\n",
    "attachments": []
}