Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/MFBQMCMJMOASNAN36LNZDDD54UAXE7ZT/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "MFBQMCMJMOASNAN36LNZDDD54UAXE7ZT",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/26W4WUS65UQJSYZG7SSIIA4WJ2BYLMPJ/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "n0jy (a) lavabit.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "N0JY",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: 23Cm Up converter",
    "date": "2009-08-25T21:02:51Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/HJGFDUKZRPOWMZFJ5CU2X2XHVIOYPDZQ/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Hi Mario,\n\nFor L band uplink I use an SSB Electronics UTM 1200DLX.  It generates \nabout 15 watts out for 5 watts in.  It has a 144MHz input.  If I am \nworking mode L/S, I will use my FT-817 for the mode L input, the 5 watts \n(about 3 to the UTM 1200 on the roof) works fine.  That leaves the \nFT-736 for the 144 MHz IF for the S band downlink.  Mode L/U would allow \nthe use of just the FT-736, 144MHz for the UTM 1200 and then receive on \nthe 70cm side.\n\n73,\nJerry\nN0JY\n\nIK1ZQJ Mario wrote:\n> Hello Domenico I8CVS\n> Tnx for your suggest very appreciated.\n> Yes I agree with you, the transverter needs to have a stable oscillator to work (ocxo, tcxo) and a pa is needed today done also with the semiconductor like module or mosfet.\n> On this last issue I have many project available in my lab.\n> Coming back to the transverter, do you think that the IF in VHF is suitable also when I'm working in mode L/S where the Smode is done through a down converter 2400/144MHz?\n> Sure, have a radio with a third band solve all the problems, probably IC910 newer or the glorius 790.\n> I'm scratching the head to take a decision..\n>\n> 73 Mario IK1ZQJ\n>\n>\n>\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n> ____________________________________________________________________________________\n> Use the link below to report this message as spam.\n> https://lavabit.com/apps/teacher?sig=706555&key=2397827412\n> ____________________________________________________________________________________\n>\n>   \n\n",
    "attachments": []
}