Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/MKINIEVLTTXGSKP6MGWV23QNGVF4J3MP/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "MKINIEVLTTXGSKP6MGWV23QNGVF4J3MP",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/IZ5B6TSOOGFSMNE3R46D2RSKISARC7SY/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "n0jy (a) n0jy.org",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "n0jy",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: D STAR",
    "date": "2013-11-11T16:24:06Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/DYITP4XT2AIZUHCR43BBU6QT4WFDIVVW/",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "I use D-STAR Digital Data on 1.2 GHz for my Winlink RMS Packet CMS \nconnection, 24/7.\nThe Pactor 3 mode that I use for Winlink HF forwarding is proprietary.  \nBut nobody else has come up with anything near as good (yet).  So a lot \nof hams use it because it does the job well.\nWe use D-STAR DD 1.2 GHz as a backup to the local internet connection \nfor EMCOMM at the EOC and I do the same at home, too. WebEOC for example.\nD-STAR is another tool in the box, another readily available method that \nmight be better in a particular circumstance.  Why limit myself by not \nhaving a set of metric sockets for my wrench?\n\nBut to the subject how about some D-STAR DD on the satellites?  You \nwould need to figure out a way around the L-band downlink e.g. a receive \nconverter from another band or something...\nMaybe not necessarily (easily) feasible but nonetheless perhaps a \nthought path to other digital ideas for satellites.  Both data and voice.\nThese are just more fun things to think about!\n\nBy the way, did you know that the MCU on the Fox-1 satellite is \nproprietary? ;-)\n\nJerry\nN0JY\n\nOn 11/11/2013 9:22 AM, Rob wrote:\n> I have no doubt some form of voice over data will be the norm someday but I\n> have doubts that will be D-STAR in it's current form. If it switches to a\n> non-proprietary protocol ... or the patent on AMBE expires then maybe.\n>\n> ... but Amateur Radio isn't about just buying some vendors latest gadget\n> like it's the latest iPhone .... it's about experimentation or\n> more accurately:\n>\n>> Continuation and extension of the amateur's proven ability to contribute\n> to the advancement of the radio art.\n>\n>> Encouragement and improvement of the amateur service through rules which\n> provide for advancing skills in both the communication and technical phases\n> of the art.\n>\n>> Expansion of the existing reservoir within the amateur radio service of\n> trained operators, technicians, and electronics experts.\n>\n> (source: Title 47 CFR Part 97.1)\n>\n>\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}