Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/MPA4ATGO7GVLNUQAJLBVOAIWZM7T5HO4/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "MPA4ATGO7GVLNUQAJLBVOAIWZM7T5HO4",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/MPA4ATGO7GVLNUQAJLBVOAIWZM7T5HO4/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "n5uxt (a) hotmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "a342490f7e9a4e4c9a9460642e57eb1f",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/a342490f7e9a4e4c9a9460642e57eb1f/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Angelo Glorioso",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb]  Re: Newbie needs advice on which transceiver to get",
    "date": "2013-08-02T21:07:38Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/V6H7UFFEVH3K3FUFXVGKREYZHXWE6LBY/?format=api",
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/V4XK2B4MNBUYNZNVJDTQPQCXHZ7A64BS/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "\n\nAlan,\n\n Thanks for the reply. I usually don't reply to many emails here, but I feel\n this was necessary. I bare to disagree with you Alan. If I would have known\n the rig had a birdie right on the downlink frequency of two of the most \npopular\n fm birds,  I would not have purchased the rig years ago. Making a\n statement of a \"few quirks\" does not give a person a fair assessment of the\n rig. I just feel it is a very important fact.\n\n\n\n Angelo / N5UXT\n\n\n> ----- Original Message ----- \n> From: \"Alan\" <[email protected]>\n> To: \"'Angelo Glorioso'\" <[email protected]>\n> Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 2:14 PM\n> Subject: RE: [amsat-bb] Re: Newbie needs advice on which transceiver to \n> get\n>\n>\n>> Angelo,\n>>\n>>>>rig it does have a few quirks.\n>>\n>> There was no need to bury him with details.\n>>\n>> Alan\n>> WA4SCA\n>>\n>>\n>> -----Original Message-----\n>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On \n>> Behalf Of Angelo Glorioso\n>> Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 7:34 AM\n>> To: [email protected]\n>> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Newbie needs advice on which transceiver to get\n>>\n>> Hi Oscar and Alan,\n>>\n>> Please be aware of the birdie right on the downlink of SO50. This is an\n>> internal birdie. I think it is very important to pass this on. It will\n>> affect AO27 also if it comes back to life or any\n>> satellite that uses 436.800 as a downlink.\n>>\n>>\n>> 73 de Angelo\n>>\n>>\n>> ----- Original Message ----- \n>> From: \"Alan\" <[email protected]>\n>> To: \"'Oscar Ortega'\" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>\n>> Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 7:07 AM\n>> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Newbie needs advice on which transceiver to get\n>>\n>>\n>>> Hi Oscar,\n>>>\n>>> Call?\n>>>\n>>> Any of those should work fine, and you should include the Kenwood \n>>> TS-2000\n>>> in your search list.  It is\n>>> still in production, and well thought of, though like nearly every other\n>>> rig it does have a few\n>>> quirks.\n>>>\n>>> The FT-847 is still a great rig, and is usually snapped up whenever a \n>>> good\n>>> used one becomes available.\n>>> The first batch had \"write only\" CAT control, with all of the following\n>>> ones having bidirectional\n>>> capability which is needed for modern control programs such as SatPC32.\n>>> Many of the first ones where\n>>> modified, but if you consider one, make certain it has the update.\n>>>\n>>> Note that you can use two regular rigs together to form a satellite\n>>> station.  Some people find a good\n>>> eBay or flea market rig as a second unit.  Again, programs like SatPC32\n>>> will work with this\n>>> combination and make it look like a single rig.  For instance, our \n>>> Dayton\n>>> Hamvention demo station uses\n>>> two FT-817s.\n>>>\n>>> 73s,\n>>>\n>>> Alan\n>>> WA4SCA\n>>>\n>>>\n>>>\n>>>\n>>> -----Original Message-----\n>>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On\n>>> Behalf Of Oscar Ortega\n>>> Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 6:52 PM\n>>> To: [email protected]\n>>> Subject: [amsat-bb] Newbie needs advice on which transceiver to get\n>>>\n>>> Hi,\n>>>\n>>> I recently got interested in trying satellite communications. I bought \n>>> an\n>>> Arrow antenna and I am\n>>> wondering\n>>> which transceiver to get. So far I have found the FT-847, IC-910h and\n>>> IC-9100.\n>>>\n>>> The FT-847 scares me since it is a bit old, however I have heard it is\n>>> very good for satellite and\n>>> EME.\n>>>\n>>> Any advice would be appreciated!!\n>>>\n>>> Regards,\n>>> Oscar\n>>> _______________________________________________\n>>> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite \n>>> program!\n>>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>>>\n>>> _______________________________________________\n>>> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite \n>>> program!\n>>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>>>\n>>\n>> _______________________________________________\n>> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite \n>> program!\n>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>>\n>>\n> \n\n",
    "attachments": []
}