Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/MTSFAUGYWADVFAMGTDEAWZGLTHX6VUTT/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "96415DFCD13A40419B3377E904344F44@jerryPC",
    "message_id_hash": "MTSFAUGYWADVFAMGTDEAWZGLTHX6VUTT",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/MTSFAUGYWADVFAMGTDEAWZGLTHX6VUTT/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "jkboxk (a) wildblue.net",
        "mailman_id": "019eea6a0341499ab28ff3b0270bb2eb",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/019eea6a0341499ab28ff3b0270bb2eb/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "jerry keeton",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb]  aprs contacts",
    "date": "2011-06-07T03:28:14Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "I have many qsl cards from hams I have made contact with using packet on the ISS . I don't acknowledge a qso unless He acknowledges My call sign in return . What really takes the time from a pass is when someone has mail and doesn't download it from RS0ISS-11 mail box. Can't get to the repeater when it's trying to deliver mail . \n\n I find NO-44 active for packet , but doesn't get much traffic . It is very hard to reach at times , but still usuable .\n\nI agree also , psk31 would very much limit the contacts made on a pass. I use psk31 on FM and it is very quiet and pleasant to use , but don't think it would make a good digital format for satellite work .\n\nJerry WB5LHD\n",
    "attachments": []
}