Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/MUESIBZZN4RK2DYWFV6JIOCUO4BRPKG7/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/MUESIBZZN4RK2DYWFV6JIOCUO4BRPKG7/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "MUESIBZZN4RK2DYWFV6JIOCUO4BRPKG7",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/MUESIBZZN4RK2DYWFV6JIOCUO4BRPKG7/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "vk3jed (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "e049fcabdd4648088cd7ce227ab7c655",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/e049fcabdd4648088cd7ce227ab7c655/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Tony Langdon",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: SO-50 under-utilized over North America",
    "date": "2006-11-08T22:53:51Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "At 09:24 AM 11/9/2006, Martin Gillen wrote:\n>Hi, John.\n>\n>I'm in Ottawa, and I'm new to satellites.\n>\n>SO-50 is one of the sats that I am going to try out because all I have\n>is an FM handie-talkie.  I've built an (admittedly heavy!) antenna\n>which is a 6 element 70cm beam and a 4 element 2m beam joined\n>together, but I'm not sure if it will have enough gain for SO-50, my\n>H/T will only do about 4W max, and if possible I'd like to run it at\n>0.5 or 1.5W to extend the battery life.\n>\n>I noticed your signature line \"Satellite QRPer\" so I thought you might\n>know if I ought to be able to transmit only 1/2W and have a reliable\n>QSO.\n\nWell, I have worked satellites in the past (specifically UO-14, when \nit was active) with 0.25W and a 2 element Yagi.  When the uplink is \nquiet, your 0.5W will work fine.  However, both contention from hams \nand foreign QRM will increase the uplink requirements \nconsiderably.  In any case, give it a whirl! :-)\n\n73 de VK3JED\nhttp://vkradio.com\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}