Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/MV7BWYGQBG5TS62DJJKEPESP44KV3H4D/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/MV7BWYGQBG5TS62DJJKEPESP44KV3H4D/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "MV7BWYGQBG5TS62DJJKEPESP44KV3H4D",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/NIXRGDSU3DRULEMDGRNZH4RAUOJMATIY/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "ve3gyq (a) amsat.org",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "David B. Toth",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Keep It Simple Silly",
    "date": "2007-10-01T03:38:09Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/JX6BC63FSHIOOJQ5ONQSGL7D3LN3XYQH/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "At 03:23 PM 9/30/2007, SV1BSX wrote:\n\n>----- Original Message -----\n>From: <[email protected]>\n>To: <[email protected]>\n>Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2007 21:01\n>Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Keep It Simple Silly\n>\n>\n> >  It's  probably true to say\n> > that Eagle will use 20,000 transistors to do the same job  as 20\n> > transistors\n> > in Oscar 7. But it's also fair to say those 20,000  transistors will do a\n> > much\n> > better job.\n> >\n>....hmmm, and its also unfair to don't say that,  the possibility for a\n>malfuction with 20,000 vs\n>20 transistors is ....  1,000 times greater !\n>\n>Simple mathematics... even if  these 20,000 transistors\n>do a better job,  the risk  is too big.\n\nEven simpler math ...\n1 out of 20 failing is likely worse than 1 out of 20,000 ...\n\nG0MRF is correct of course ... SuitSat-2 will test the SDX ...\n\nI'm not sure where anyone thinks this \"debate\" is going - it IS going \nto be an SDX and not analog ... this has already been decided on as \nfar as I can see ... and I sat through a lot of talks at the DCC \nabout this stuff. Because that is: a) what the guys doing all of the \nwork want to do, and b) what is required to provide the services \ndesired for the power budget available.\n\nHowever, we might be able to put a spark-gap up there if we need \nsomething \"rad-hardened\" ...\n\n<sigh>\n\nDave\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}