Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/MXIBZT26EDSEDCWD2ENIAKE5DH3JRTGW/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "MXIBZT26EDSEDCWD2ENIAKE5DH3JRTGW",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/QW4BD3KSY4HPETO2N6UKSUIUKKXJIHUA/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "kq6ea (a) verizon.net",
        "mailman_id": "d2ef86d749ee450c8ad9ffc9f2e15cad",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/d2ef86d749ee450c8ad9ffc9f2e15cad/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "Jim Jerzycke",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: HRD 6.0 and Satellite Tracker",
    "date": "2013-05-24T03:38:28Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/EM2S7F75VMOBDYG57B2IP7FVQTQHZ7G2/",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "There are several different orbital prediction models in use, and I \nwould guess that they are not using the same one.\n\nSatPC32 gives you a choice in the setup options, but it's been so long \nsince I've used NOVA, I don't remember if or where the oprion is located.\n\n73, Jim  KQ6EA\n\n\nOn 05/24/2013 02:45 AM, Les Rayburn wrote:\n> Thanks to Dave, and many others who contacted me about the use of \n> Satellite Tracker in HRD 6.0.\n> It was exactly the kind of input that I was hoping for.\n>\n> A couple of other questions:\n>\n> 1.) I've noticed that Nova for Windows and SAT32PC display slightly \n> different data regarding AOS, LOS, Azimuth and Elevation for a given \n> satellite. This seems strange to me\n> since they're using the same KEP data, share the same PC clock which \n> is synced every 12 hours, etc.\n>\n> Anyone else notice these small differences? None of them have much \n> effect on actual operation which is governed by the beamwidth of the \n> antennas (pretty broad), objects\n> blocking the horizon, etc. but it does make me curious.\n>\n> 73,\n>\n> Les Rayburn, N1LF\n> 121 Mayfair Park\n> Maylene, AL 35114\n> EM63nf\n>\n> 6M VUCC #1712\n> AMSAT #38965\n> Grid Bandits #222\n> Southeastern VHF Society\n> Central States VHF Society Life Member\n> Six Club #2484\n>\n> Active on 6 Meters thru 1296, 10GHz & Light\n>\n>\n>\n>\n> On 5/23/2013 4:20 PM, Dave WØDHB wrote:\n>> Les\n>>\n>> I'm using HRD 6.0 SAT Tracker/HRD Rotator as well as SATPC32, \n>> predominately\n>> HRD SAT Tracker.\n>> In fact, I was using SAT Tracker when you and I QSO'd  5/20  on SO-50 .\n>>\n>> I use them in conjunction with my Flex 5000A  / EA4TX rotator \n>> controller/\n>> G5500 rotator.\n>>\n>> I am only using SAT Tracker and SATPC32 for TX/RX Doppler control as \n>> neither\n>> product has adequate support for other Flex 5000 Rig control \n>> functions IMHO\n>> .\n>>\n>> I have written software which intercepts CAT commands coming from either\n>> program and I only pass on doppler tuning info through to the Rig.\n>> The same software allows me to do other required Rig control functions:\n>>     -TX\n>>     -TX/RX calibration for transponder satellites\n>>     -RIT\n>>     -Transmit power adjust\n>>     -Satellite specific controls-TX/RX mode, tones, reset SO-50 timer,\n>> etc.\n>> I also have provided support for my TS-2000 and IC-9100 in the software.\n>> My preference for SAT Tracker is primarily because I like the user \n>> interface\n>> better.\n>>\n>> Some caveats on using HRD 6.0 SAT Tracker/HRD Rotator natively with any\n>> supported rig:\n>> HRD Rotator does not play nicely with Rotators with a south stop\n>> (Yaesu-5400), you can make it work, but software azimuth readout is \n>> 180 deg\n>> off\n>> HRD SAT Tracker does not support transponders of the \"Non-inverting \n>> type\"\n>> (like AO-7 mode A)\n>>\n>> Dave W0DHB\n>>\n>>\n>\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite \n> program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}