Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/N2A4HHCWI6CQBH2ONZV5Z3NPULQDOAIW/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "CAN8zKtT4qCTppn6m2JYdHunaK6XKo0nW05OWzTzKf1pqnJD1nw@mail.gmail.com",
    "message_id_hash": "N2A4HHCWI6CQBH2ONZV5Z3NPULQDOAIW",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/R5A74XCPKHEHGLBDRJOKR6MIEXPP6KDA/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "matthew (a) mrstevens.net",
        "mailman_id": "9211e31bd97d4743ace6c47863af3e1b",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/9211e31bd97d4743ace6c47863af3e1b/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Matthew Stevens",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] Field Day (whew)",
    "date": "2018-06-25T19:49:17Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/DZ7FQXSTULHP3LY33A5SBOXEWCMB6PYZ/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "The first AO91 pass after start time on saturday, I just listened to\nN5AT (op KG5CCI) doing an awesome job as what you have called the \"net\ncontrol\" station. I have a feeling half the people on the pass\nwouldn't have made a qso at all if it hadn't been for Dave calling\nthem amid all the \"CQ field day\" and callsign-dropping, keying down,\nand aprs packets (why? Who knows lol). And Dave was operating the same\nas I did this weekend, a handheld antenna and manually tuned rig.\n\nI have mixed feelings about the one-Q FM sat rule - it makes sense in\na way, but in my experience one competent, experienced op (keyword\nthere is competent..) on the FM sats can make a lot of FM-only HT ops\nvery very happy, scoring them their 100 point bonus they promised for\ntheir clubs! I guess the rule does (hopefully) prevent the\nuber-stations from tying up the pass working each other to pad scores,\nbut it doesn't do anything about the massive QRM that always seems to\nhappen on FM. I'm glad to hear a few guys on there who are worried\nless about their own scores, and more about handing out contacts to\nthose that really need them on Field Day.\n\nI pretty much just hung out on linears this year, operating for about\nan hour and a half total on sats while waiting for 6m to open.It was a\nlot of fun, and by and large I thought most everyone I heard was doing\na great job. There was only a few stations that never seemed to hear\nwhen they were called. Overall, good job to all the amsat ops, and I'm\nlooking forward to next year!\n\n73,\n\n- Matthew nj4y\n\n\nOn Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 1:05 PM, Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)\n<[email protected]> wrote:\n> Hi Bruce!\n>\n> Based on the passes I heard and worked, if there was a\n> station strong enough to get through and complete QSOs,\n> others hoped that station would stick around and make\n> more QSOs. Otherwise, why would anyone call a station\n> just after that station completed a QSO? That was the\n> case for me on the two passes I mentioned - I complete\n> one QSO, then others called me. I could have gone silent\n> and not answered any of them, but I decided to make the\n> non-scoring QSOs, and one of those non-scoring QSOs\n> was the bonus-scoring QSO one club was hoping to make.\n> What I did on the SO-50 and AO-91 passes was, in effect,\n> the \"net control\" station you mentioned. When I get my\n> Field Day report to you, you will see those non-scoring\n> contacts noted - just as I have done for most of the past\n> few years.\n>\n> I'm not saying the scoring should change for FM satellites.\n> Short of declaring FM satellites off-limits like ARRL does\n> with the WARC bands and 60m for its Field Day, it seems\n> like the situation won't change. Or have AO-92 in L-band\n> all weekend. :-)\n>\n> 73!\n>\n>\n>\n>\n> Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK\n> http://www.wd9ewk.net/\n> Twitter: @WD9EWK or http://twitter.com/WD9EWK\n>\n>\n>\n> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 4:53 PM, Bruce <[email protected]> wrote:\n>\n>> In the AMSAT rules we do state, because someone asked about it, you can be\n>> a net control type station and work every station you want. You would only\n>> be able to score one contact yourself but had given many out to those\n>> trying to make the 100 point satellite bonus.\n>>\n>> We still feel by limiting to one FM contact that if you worked someone and\n>> both of you leave the bird, two more stations can work each other thereby\n>> maximazing the number of possible contacts on the satellite during a single\n>> pass.\n>>\n>> 73...bruce\n>>\n>>\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed\n> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n",
    "attachments": []
}