Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/N2WTH2FKYLGCQEFD4DCDXMQYCWKI4KOW/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "010320092136.3174.495FDA5D000B3C9C00000C6622120207840B9D04C999@comcast.net",
    "message_id_hash": "N2WTH2FKYLGCQEFD4DCDXMQYCWKI4KOW",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/N2WTH2FKYLGCQEFD4DCDXMQYCWKI4KOW/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "w7lrd (a) comcast.net",
        "mailman_id": "717aa2a241704c7497e9abd8c983f6b7",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/717aa2a241704c7497e9abd8c983f6b7/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "[email protected]",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: What would be a good radio ???",
    "date": "2009-01-03T21:36:29Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/OPF23NRQABGZOZDA25PDZEQ3FEIWQALZ/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Don't forget the IC-1271A. Icoms 1.2Ghz  10W transceiver no longer being produced.  They are rare and still command a high price.  I found one from this BB several years ago.\n73 Bob W7LRD\nSeattle\n\n--\n\"if this were easy, everyone would be doing it\"\n\n-------------- Original message -------------- \nFrom: Sebastian <[email protected]> \n\n> ICOM IC-910H if you want 1.2 GHz. Radio is in production, a bit on \n> the expensive side, but you get what you pay for. \n> \n> Otherwise a Yaesu FT-847; no longer in production, doesn't have 1.2 \n> GHz but can be added with a transverter. The Yaesu FT-736R is still \n> an excellent radio but really getting old, and parts may be a problem; \n> many suffer from broken internal power supplies, however you can use \n> an external one. \n> \n> If I missed any, I'm sure someone else will give you more ideas. \n> \n> I also have a TS-2000 for HF, but use the FT-847 for satellite work. \n> Some have said that if you use a mast mounted preamp for 440 MHz, and \n> disable the TS-2000's internal preamp, that significantly cuts out the \n> birdy. I haven't tried that because my preamps are fed their voltage \n> directly with the coax via the FT-847. The TS-2000 doesn't have that \n> capability; why that was left out doesn't make any sense to me. \n> \n> \n> 73 de W4AS \n> Sebastian \n> \n> On Jan 3, 2009, at 1:33 PM, racer5039 wrote: \n> \n> > I have a TS-2000 that I am using now to work the birds but am you \n> > all know the Kenwood TS-2000 has a problem with the down link at or \n> > around 436.800. \n> > My question is...what would be a good radio to use on these birds? \n> > Maybe something that would cover the 1.2G stuff as well. \n> > Thansk to all those that helped me out with the SSB Sat tuning. \n> > It has really helped me out. \n> > Thanks again. \n> > \n> > Marv \n> > N0FJP \n> > _______________________________________________ \n> > Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the \n> > author. \n> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite \n> > program! \n> > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb \n> \n> _______________________________________________ \n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. \n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! \n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb \n",
    "attachments": []
}