Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/N7EQH6OK333TGG3HOZQ53TW66AT6DUJF/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "003401c9d711$7e4c1120$0300a8c0@Tanguray",
    "message_id_hash": "N7EQH6OK333TGG3HOZQ53TW66AT6DUJF",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/D2SHA7WJAIRVODYBTP5GLMVGFY32GAMK/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "rogerkola (a) aol.com",
        "mailman_id": "8323dbe496014835b5bd2be9b5ff6f66",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/8323dbe496014835b5bd2be9b5ff6f66/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Roger Kolakowski",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Gain VS Bandwidth at 2.4GHZ",
    "date": "2009-05-17T17:04:07Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/FYGQL7W5TFKKRCIMGTEILP3RVFSW6SYX/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Although it is a good thought I can not take credit for the writing of\nit...Roger  WA1KAT\n\n----- Original Message -----\nFrom: \"Luc Leblanc\" <[email protected]>\nTo: <[email protected]>\nSent: Sunday, May 17, 2009 8:09 AM\nSubject: [amsat-bb] Re: Gain VS Bandwidth at 2.4GHZ\n\n\n> On 16 May 2009 at 17:27, Roger Kolakowski wrote:\n>\n> A part of my mystery is solved WiFi and WiMAX I am not a big fan of WiFi\nas i have some security concern but i discover that i don't have\n> the best antenna for 2.4 and fiddling with it is not an option. A true 2.4\nis in the mail to replace it and with 2 antennas now i will be\n> able to install them to have vertical and horizontal polarisation and i\nwill see if there is some improvement at 2.4ghz when switching\n> between them. Nobody answer me back regarding the S band linear \"not\ncircular\" AO-51 antenna but the fades are probably due to some\n> antenna blocking than anything else. On the last S band session me and\nClare VE3NPC noted that the fades does not happen at the same time\n> on our respective QTH there is surely not some selective circular\npolarisation path?\n>\n> > This was probably just a typo; if so, pardon the reply...\n> >\n> I was mixing both...hi\n> >\n> > Wi-Fi and Wi-Max are different things.  An antenna designed for Wi-Max\n> > may not operate very well, as you describe, on 2.4 ghz.  Wi-Fi's\n> > 802.11b/g is on 2.4 ghz (channel 1 is right on top of our allocation),\n> > so a properly designed Wi-Fi antenna could be good for 13cm Ham\n> > applications.\n> >\n> > >\n> > Enjoy the new toy,\n> >\n> > Greg  KO6TH\n> >\n>\n> Some experimenting to come on the next S band session.\n>\n> \"-\"\n>\n>\n> Luc Leblanc VE2DWE\n> Skype VE2DWE\n> www.qsl.net/ve2dwe\n> WAC BASIC CW PHONE SATELLITE\n>\n>\n>\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}