Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/NAMVFSK5UHU6SCYWIYYAIETMAJSKCCI5/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "NAMVFSK5UHU6SCYWIYYAIETMAJSKCCI5",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/XI53ZHPEUQQOGOKPD5PTD67GFKSXWGL6/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "ptrowe (a) yahoo.com",
        "mailman_id": "435267f43dda40d2801be9a2fe9930fd",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/435267f43dda40d2801be9a2fe9930fd/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Pete Rowe",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Web Page VS Orbitron",
    "date": "2011-02-19T21:16:58Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/QXF2CYGDYPKMB3S5RAVWCLKA5B3MYVMI/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "I've used Orbitron  for several years with updates from Celestrak without ever having incorrect predictions.\n\n\n73,\nPete WA6WOA\n\n--- On Sat, 2/19/11, Alan P. Biddle <[email protected]> wrote:\n\nFrom: Alan P. Biddle <[email protected]>\nSubject: [amsat-bb] Re: Web Page VS Orbitron\nTo: \"AMSAT-BB\" <[email protected]>\nDate: Saturday, February 19, 2011, 12:12 PM\n\nI don't use Orbitron, but there is something a little odd here.  Celestrak\ngets the Keps from Spacetrac, and according to the Orbitron site, they get\ntheirs from Celestrak and another site which seems to get at least some of\ntheirs from the same place.  I am not saying people aren't seeing something,\nbut it is almost certainly not the accuracy or timeliness of the Keps.\nPerhaps a formatting issue?\n\nAlan\nWA4SCA\n\n\n-----Original Message-----\nFrom: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On\nBehalf Of Joe\nSent: Saturday, February 19, 2011 1:35 PM\nTo: Zachary Beougher\nCc: [email protected]\nSubject: [amsat-bb] Re: Web Page VS Orbitron\n\nThat was it!  the stoff.pl set uploaded and now they agree!\n\nThanks!\n\nJoe WB9SBD\n\nThe Original Rolling Ball Clock\nIdle Tyme\nIdle-Tyme.com\nhttp://www.idle-tyme.com\n\nOn 2/19/2011 1:17 PM, Zachary Beougher wrote:\n> Joe,\n>\n> I have found Orbitron's to be off when I download the keps from \n> celstrak.com.  I assume you are downloading them from there - \n> correct?  If so, try getting it from stoff.pl.  I have always found \n> them to be right on. I have checked N2YO's tracking program out \n> before, and it is very dependable.  If the two disagree, I would go \n> with N2YO.\n>\n> 73!\n>\n> Zack\n> KD8KSN\n>\n> -----Original Message----- From: Joe\n> Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2011 1:55 PM\n> To: [email protected]\n> Subject: [amsat-bb] Web Page VS Orbitron\n>\n> I found a web page that says it can track\n>\n> http://www.n2yo.com/?s=7530\n>\n> and i installed a new Orbitron, and gave it the latest set of keps it\n> wanted to do.\n>\n> Thing is the two things do not agree at all where Oscar 7 is at.  not\n> even close.\n>\n> soo  how do I tell who is right other than to wait for a pass from\n> either one and see if i hear anything.\n>\n> Joe WB9SBD\n_______________________________________________\nSent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\nNot an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\nSubscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n\n\n_______________________________________________\nSent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\nNot an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\nSubscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n\n\n\n      \n",
    "attachments": []
}