Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/ND56UTUAMIETOTBYW4WLUPA6MAJBS7BG/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/ND56UTUAMIETOTBYW4WLUPA6MAJBS7BG/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "CAPvDab14VvTN3SzXY-Ytagn1tHVNQJQEHCfmAQDAas-nQ-2NPA@mail.gmail.com",
    "message_id_hash": "ND56UTUAMIETOTBYW4WLUPA6MAJBS7BG",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/ND56UTUAMIETOTBYW4WLUPA6MAJBS7BG/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "badencapecod (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "228ae4f5c3d547ef8d3f4c2b1e03205d",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/228ae4f5c3d547ef8d3f4c2b1e03205d/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Wes Baden",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] New version of LOTW",
    "date": "2020-09-13T10:38:37Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/IPII4NY3YR67CAGKRAWE2DSKZXZI246S/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Anyone else not pleased with the new version \"improving\" LOTW, at least as\nit involves SAT contacts?  Can we get ARRL to undo some things?  At least\non my computer, you no longer can press the Enter key to go down entry\nfields one after another.  It's a much slower process now.  Also, the two\nmost common modes that we've been using on LOTW, CW and VOICE, are no\nlonger first in line, where an expanded list of modes is alphabetized.\nThis also slows down entries.  Worse yet, VOICE is no longer a listed mode\nat all.  It's been replaced by SSB, LSB and USB.  I could be wrong, but\nisn't this in particular going to make QSO matching more difficult?  Should\nSAT ops simply enter SSB, or should it be USB (the output of satellites) or\nLSB (our input to them)?  In sum, the whole process is now slower with\nmultiple opportunities for matching errors and contacts not being\nconfirmed.  Ugh.\n\nWes NA1ME\n",
    "attachments": []
}