Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/NDYNXV56J4UVGIIRUHNVTR2RKEHT5YMB/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "006301c6d2f5$2c6317f0$62bfe144@youre7075dc078",
    "message_id_hash": "NDYNXV56J4UVGIIRUHNVTR2RKEHT5YMB",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/NDYNXV56J4UVGIIRUHNVTR2RKEHT5YMB/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "jmfranke (a) cox.net",
        "mailman_id": "6c3cc6aaa29f4579900a911c323147b7",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/6c3cc6aaa29f4579900a911c323147b7/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "jmfranke",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb]  No mode S on EAgle",
    "date": "2006-09-08T03:16:27Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "AMSAT is not a production service, it is a platform for experimentation.  Several amateur satellites support or will support S-band operation.  I have been with the program long enough (OSCAR III) to have heard the screams about abandoning mode A then mode J.  There were lots of arguments against going to S-band, and now the voices are saying please do not abandon S-band.  Well S-band is not being abandoned.  The proposed new satellite will be pushing us to explore 5.6 GHz.  I look forward to the challenge and will still continue to monitor the UHF, L-band, and S-band transmissions from AMSAT-NA, AMSAT-DL, and whoever else has the foresight, volunteers, and resources to orbit these exciting satellites.  I vote with my donations (far above and beyond subscriptions), and I have donated to many birds, including Eagle.\n\nJohn  WA4WDL\n#10211\n",
    "attachments": []
}