Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/NG6QVNJZ4P3ORWRTYW4NPODUHC2WCZKC/
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/NG6QVNJZ4P3ORWRTYW4NPODUHC2WCZKC/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "NG6QVNJZ4P3ORWRTYW4NPODUHC2WCZKC",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/NG6QVNJZ4P3ORWRTYW4NPODUHC2WCZKC/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "we1u (a) myfairpoint.net",
        "mailman_id": "dcfd889d3ec84275bf8429cdbec0525f",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/dcfd889d3ec84275bf8429cdbec0525f/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "Bob DeVarney W1ICW",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb]  Yaesu FT-726",
    "date": "2011-07-30T16:29:33Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "The Yaesu FT-726 was a decent sat rig back in the day.\n\nCons: Low power output ( only ten watts ) and limited frequency coverage \non UHF ( either 430-440 or 440-450 but not the full range )\n\nI think it lacked the tracking VFOs implemented in the FT-736 which was \na real nice feature.\n\nAlso no CAT control with this rig which was what motivated me to trade \nup to a pair of Icom twins ( IC-271 and IC-471 ).\n\nFor the money though, it would be hard to balk.\n\n73,\n\nBob W1ICW\n",
    "attachments": []
}