Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/NKHAXLASJNRU6QVZ4NF24DDSVOZYT6GO/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "NKHAXLASJNRU6QVZ4NF24DDSVOZYT6GO",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/NKHAXLASJNRU6QVZ4NF24DDSVOZYT6GO/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "w1pa (a) hotmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "40f14f46c3444acf902c22b658e82117",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/40f14f46c3444acf902c22b658e82117/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "Bill Acito W1PA",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb]  The practicality  of the Ten Tec 2510",
    "date": "2011-07-14T15:01:56Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "1. I have one, but have never used it. If I am reading the satellite guide \ncorrectly,\nthe only current bird I can use one on (mode B, 435MHz -- not 432) is VO-52. \nIs that correct?\nOr is the TX-RX completely wrong? (RX+TX=581.005)\n2. I have read that the 2510 (newer version) was much easier to use than the \n2510 -- \nany comment from current or former users?\n3. The 2510 could accept a second, add-on oscillator board (the 2511) to \ngive you 435.5 as\nwell as 435.0. I am considering building a version of the board \nre-crystalled to give me 432.0\n(understanding that I will have to go through and re-tune the unit, as well \nas adjusting the\nRX-TX offset) ---  but this seems like a nice \"non-destructive\" way to try \nit.\n\nOr should I put it on the shelf and hope the next transponder bird uses the \nsame band plan\nas AO-10/13?  :-)\n\nBill W1PA \n\n",
    "attachments": []
}