Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/NMVMSUCTJWK4E33FR3C3XHXN37VODFH7/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "CACm2je0ffbvDWA__NiPEqPDNxs9+a6Mwm08brv2vcHxtpnrprA@mail.gmail.com",
    "message_id_hash": "NMVMSUCTJWK4E33FR3C3XHXN37VODFH7",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/NMVMSUCTJWK4E33FR3C3XHXN37VODFH7/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "jefforybroughton (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "jeffory broughton",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Satellite transceivers",
    "date": "2017-04-29T20:21:14Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "It's tough to beat the air 910 for receiver sensitivity and noise figure.\nIt uses Gaasfets for the rf amps on both bands.I have two of them at both\nmy primary and secondary qth.They both check at .12 uv on uhf and .11 uv on\nvhf for 20 db.That is state of the art stuff.If you  compare the specs on\nthe ic 910H and the new 9100 on vhf and uhf you will find them to be\nidentical.WB8RJY\n\njeff broughton\n",
    "attachments": []
}