Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/NOB6YTGGJM6TL3GSXX7NQJGATPMIHZKH/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "NOB6YTGGJM6TL3GSXX7NQJGATPMIHZKH",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/NOB6YTGGJM6TL3GSXX7NQJGATPMIHZKH/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "n5uxt (a) hotmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "a342490f7e9a4e4c9a9460642e57eb1f",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/a342490f7e9a4e4c9a9460642e57eb1f/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "Angelo Glorioso",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: FD Contacts!",
    "date": "2007-06-26T17:48:20Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/U4WXSH5YAVYK54JWB5DEN5GCC7A3MTQS/"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": " \n Better yet! How many QSO's did the Satellite police prevent because of his\nBROADCAST STATEMENTS????? \n \n \n73 de Angelo\n \n \n--------------------------------------------------------- \nIf you don't ask, you will never know!!\n\n\n\n> From: [email protected]> To: [email protected]> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 22:20:31 -0500> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: FD Contacts!> > Actually, it's implicit in rule 7.2 of the \"ARRL General Rules for All > Contests\":> \"7.2. Score reduction may be made for taking credit for unconfirmed QSOs or > multipliers, duplicate contacts or other scoring discrepancies.\"> > (operative phrase being \"scoring discrepancies\")> > At the very least, the station handing out contacts violated the intent of > the \"one contact\" rule. Moreover, for every one contact he \"handed out\", > TWO other stations could have made their contacts and gotten off the bird. > He actually DECREASED the QSO rate....> > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: \"Jim Jerzycke\" <[email protected]>> To: \"George Henry\" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>> Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 2:50 PM> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: FD Contacts!> > > > The rules say nothing about more than one contact> > voiding the others, or about making a contact with> > someone who has already made more than one.> > All you get is the 100 points; more contacts on an FM> > bird get you nothing but the wrath of everyone who> > hears you.> > Jim KQ6EA> >> > --- George Henry <[email protected]> wrote:> >> >>> >>> >> -----Original Message-----> >> >From: \"Reicher, James\" <[email protected]>> >> >Sent: Jun 25, 2007 9:37 AM> >> >To: [email protected]> >> >Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: FD Contacts!> >> >> >> >I managed my one contact per FM bird also and then> >> concentrated on AO-7> >> >and VO-52. I didn't manage as many as George, but> >> we did pretty well.> >> >> >> >I found the FM birds to be much more orderly than> >> in years past. I> >> >thought that the one station who was handing out> >> quick contacts to the> >> >others worked very well.> >>> >> [snip]> >>> >>> >> I'm not sure that I see the upside to someone> >> \"handing out quick contacts\" that will ultimately be> >> tossed because he broke the rules.... invalid Q's> >> are invalid for BOTH parties, are they not? If that> >> was someone's one and only satellite contact, there> >> goes their 100-point bonus!> >>> >>> >> George, KA3HSW> > _______________________________________________> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n_________________________________________________________________\nPlay free games, earn tickets, get cool prizes! Join Live Search Club. \nhttp://club.live.com/home.aspx?icid=CLUB_wlmailtextlink",
    "attachments": []
}