Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/NU5A73CQVWKJ5PY5GGEALA2OHI5JOK7D/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "NU5A73CQVWKJ5PY5GGEALA2OHI5JOK7D",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/RIIBSNZJPGPCNWEXBDO6WJ5FQJDUPU5C/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "mschulz (a) creative-chaos.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Michael Schulz",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: AO-51 pass at 22:06 UTC 2011-10-01",
    "date": "2011-10-02T13:08:08Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/FRO2PXHVG5U2QTG4R4DMJTFJ7RGMD3FC/",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "On Sun, 2011-10-02 at 05:52 -0700, Jeffrey Koehler wrote:\n> It amazes me that people to this day still call, \"CQ satellite CQ\n> satellite\" and having it be so obvious that they cannot hear the\n> downlink.\n> \n> \n> Unbelievable.\nNot necessarily unbelievable but aren't there many folks out there\nwho work FM sats with a single HT and simply rely on the set\nfrequencies? I personally would never want to work like that but, \nthat's just me :).\n\n73 Mike \n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}