Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/NU7KLRYQF6BQP7TVG2HCYPFKHI5DGVGM/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "NU7KLRYQF6BQP7TVG2HCYPFKHI5DGVGM",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/QRPOU5QW7RFSUF7YHYUA2KCFRB4PAKGO/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "ko6th_greg (a) hotmail.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Greg D.",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: CW from an FM HT",
    "date": "2006-10-31T04:52:51Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/QRPOU5QW7RFSUF7YHYUA2KCFRB4PAKGO/",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "How about the Kenwood TH-F6?  FM transmit, SSB/CW receive, though not at the \nsame time (not fdx).  The all-mode \"B\" side is a little less sensitive than \n\"A\", but it still might be worth a try.  (Of course, the CW neurons between \nthe ears will need a bit of polishing...)\n\nGreg  KO6TH\n\n\n----Original Message Follows----\nFrom: John W Lee <[email protected]>\nTo: [email protected]\nCC: [email protected]\nSubject: [amsat-bb] Re: CW from an FM HT\nDate: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 16:06:35 -0700\n\n\nA lot of the time, you don't have to QSY much on CW,\nso the step isn't all that super important. Just pick a spot and\ngive out a few CQ's.  Of course you have to have some other\nreceiver than the HT unless it receives SSB/CW.\n\n(I used to get some  SSB/CW  QSO's on the old birds)\nCall CQ on CW and get a SSB answer or vice-versa..  Of course\nat that time most folks could copy CW.\n\n73\nJohn\n\n >\n > I was doing some testing here at home with this.  I used an IC-W32A\n > and IC-T7H\n > with a straight key plugged into the mic jack on each radio.\n > Nothing fancy from\n > the key, just an adapter to fit the 3/32\" (2.5mm) jack, and I could\n > key the\n > transmitter.  When I did this, listening on another radio, I could\n > hear only the\n > carrier.  No audio was coming from the HTs' built-in mics.\n >\n > I might try this on FO-29 this evening, and maybe VO-52.  One\n > additional\n > drawback with an HT for a CW transmitter is the fact that most HTs\n > (including these two I tried this morning) have 5 kHz as the\n > smallest tuning\n > step.  I also have an FT-817ND, but I only have one of those\n > radios.\n > Otherwise, I would be trying all of this with a pair of FT-817s and\n > making\n > some CW and SSB contacts.\n >\n > 73!\n >\n >\n > Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK\n >\n_______________________________________________\nSent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\nNot an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\nSubscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n\n_________________________________________________________________\nGet FREE company branded e-mail accounts and business Web site from \nMicrosoft Office Live \nhttp://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/mcrssaub0050001411mrt/direct/01/\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}