Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/NW36WUYCDBX3C2KG5NS7DWREK2P72LF2/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/NW36WUYCDBX3C2KG5NS7DWREK2P72LF2/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "NW36WUYCDBX3C2KG5NS7DWREK2P72LF2",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/NW36WUYCDBX3C2KG5NS7DWREK2P72LF2/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "wb3jfs (a) cox.net",
        "mailman_id": "bdfc678d05af4f3f96c14d823fd3fbcf",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/bdfc678d05af4f3f96c14d823fd3fbcf/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Jeff Yanko",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] Interesting articke",
    "date": "2014-10-02T01:02:16Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "\nOn 10/1/2014 4:54 PM, Jeff Yanko wrote:\n> I can see how this could be construed and not pertaining to amateur \n> radio satellites.  However, since this topic was highlighted and \n> brought to everyone's attention by an AMSAT member, and linking a \n> legitimate website, this would be an opportune time for the AMSAT \n> President or member of the board to directly contact this outlet and \n> refute such allegations and misunderstandings.  If nobody in authority \n> stands up to this, we'll just keep getting a bad rap and it could \n> damage our future endeavors through payload restrictions.\n>\n> 73,\n>\n> Jeff  WB3JFS\n>\n>\n>\n>\n>\n>\n> On 10/1/2014 4:29 PM, Gus wrote:\n>> The point is, if you post a message with a completely generic subject \n>> (like \"Interesting Article\") and a body text consisting entirely of a \n>> URL and not even a callsign in your signature, then it is \n>> indistinguishable from SPAM. Under the circumstances how was someone \n>> to know that this linked to anything of interest to a ham radio \n>> operator, and not to some porno site or a credit card scam or similar?\n>>\n>\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}