Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/OA2AEIM6B6TQAT6P2S3XFK7FVK5B7JIF/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "001101c9d66d$1baa6160$0300a8c0@Tanguray",
    "message_id_hash": "OA2AEIM6B6TQAT6P2S3XFK7FVK5B7JIF",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/D2SHA7WJAIRVODYBTP5GLMVGFY32GAMK/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "rogerkola (a) aol.com",
        "mailman_id": "8323dbe496014835b5bd2be9b5ff6f66",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/8323dbe496014835b5bd2be9b5ff6f66/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Roger Kolakowski",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Gain VS Bandwidth at 2.4GHZ",
    "date": "2009-05-16T21:27:25Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/2VO3574EULCDIIU3UBFGT2MPO4JNYOZZ/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/3DUSEPSA4DXPUHRXPE2IEXH4IQ3BXGY5/?format=api",
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/FYGQL7W5TFKKRCIMGTEILP3RVFSW6SYX/?format=api",
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/6RQ2MG52F36TEHGFYHCVJDI4XLPTEJWT/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Not that they were optimum tuned for the 2.5 GHz frequency but what polarity\nwere the \"Pringles Can\" washer antennas that were so popular for\nNet-Stumbling a few years ago?\n\nRoger\nWA1KAT\n----- Original Message -----\nFrom: \"Greg D.\" <[email protected]>\nTo: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>\nSent: Saturday, May 16, 2009 2:33 PM\nSubject: [amsat-bb] Re: Gain VS Bandwidth at 2.4GHZ\n\n\n\nHi Luc,\n\n\n>\n> Conclusion don't jump too fast on some hamfest deal as what's good for\nWiFI is not always so good at 2.4ghz!\n>\n\nThis was probably just a typo; if so, pardon the reply...\n\n\n\nWi-Fi and Wi-Max are different things.  An antenna designed for Wi-Max\nmay not operate very well, as you describe, on 2.4 ghz.  Wi-Fi's\n802.11b/g is on 2.4 ghz (channel 1 is right on top of our allocation),\nso a properly designed Wi-Fi antenna could be good for 13cm Ham\napplications.\n\n>\n> P.S. I can use the antenna on 2.4ghz and i got fairly\ngood signal from AO-51 when he's in S mode but i cannot get rid out of\nthe fades.\n> Could be i found why?\n>\n\nPretty much every Wi-Fi antenna I've ever seen is linearly polarized.  The\n\"diversity\" antennas are two separate antennas, usually one vertical and one\nhorizontal, with separate cables going to two radios.  Going circular would\nseem to be a no-brain improvement for the Wi-Fi crowd, but I think I've only\nseen one vendor do it.\n\nEnjoy the new toy,\n\nGreg  KO6TH\n\n\n_________________________________________________________________\nHotmail® has ever-growing storage! Don’t worry about storage limits.\nhttp://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/Storage?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutoria\nl_Storage1_052009\n_______________________________________________\nSent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\nNot an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\nSubscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}