Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/OBQJQBE4SZZP27IWZDFXO5LX4K4XT2KT/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "OBQJQBE4SZZP27IWZDFXO5LX4K4XT2KT",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/ZCE7G63BF7UEF24X2Z7AON7E267AUBCF/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "karl (a) bullock.org",
        "mailman_id": "7fec50a7b2bd468890d902c1d56561f5",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/7fec50a7b2bd468890d902c1d56561f5/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "Karl Bullock",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Redundant geostaionary birds?",
    "date": "2007-01-29T03:12:30Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/4RTMGQDKAFG7KPVBZ6LLC6IPFIJE3KPX/",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "\n\nDave hartzell wrote:\n> 3) Most of the uplink freq's are in the 5.9 GHz range (out of our\n> allocation) and downlink in the 3.7 GHz range, again, (out of our\n> allocation).\n>   \nThat may be _the_ problem.  I don't know the current capabilities of\nthese birds, and if they have any capability of either \"retuning\" to a\nclose amateur band, or if there are other assets on board, but inability\nto transmit/receive on one of our bands would probably make this a non\nsequitur.  Those with more intimate knowledge of current flying\ntechnology would need to speak to this.\n> I heard that several years ago there was talk of putting an amateur\n> transponder onboard a commercial geo-sync bird.  But I suspect\n> economics and the fact that all extra mass is reserved for\n> stationkeeping fuel.  Plus power is always critical, and over time,\n> the solar panels generate less.  Anyone know more about this?\n>   \nAnother idea I floated a few years ago (here, I think) that was shot\ndown rather quickly.  However, this one may probably have more merit.\nA micro-sat sized transponder wouldn't take much space at all, and as in\nthe previous item, donation of space on a new bird to a non-profit\norganization would be an ongoing tax writeoff, as well as a nice PR\npiece.  The satellite owners would, of course, have the ability to\nterminate use of the amateur portion, and current could be limited\neasily, but again, someone has to have the contacts to actually propose\nsuch an item.\n\nA corollary idea would be to place an amateur-band transponder on a new\nsatellite, and only activate it periodically and during emergency\nsituations.\n\n73,\nKarl, WA5TMC\n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}